Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context

The context in which service is delivered and experienced has, in many respects, fundamentally changed. For instance, advances in technology, especially information technology, are leading to a proliferation of revolutionary services and changing how customers serve themselves before, during, and after purchase. To understand this changing landscape, the authors engaged in an international and interdisciplinary research effort to identify research priorities that have the potential to advance the service field and benefit customers, organizations, and society. The priority-setting process was informed by roundtable discussions with researchers affiliated with service research centers and networks located around the world and resulted in the following 12 service research priorities: stimulating service innovation, facilitating servitization, service infusion, and solutions, understanding organization and employee issues relevant to successful service, developing service networks and systems, leveraging service design, using big data to advance service, understanding value creation, enhancing the service experience, improving well-being through transformative service, measuring and optimizing service performance and impact, understanding service in a global context, and leveraging technology to advance service. For each priority, the authors identified important specific service topics and related research questions. Then, through an online survey, service researchers assessed the subtopics’ perceived importance and the service field’s extant knowledge about them. Although all the priorities and related topics were deemed important, the results show that topics related to transformative service and measuring and optimizing service performance are particularly important for advancing the service field along with big data, which had the largest gap between importance and current knowledge of the field. The authors present key challenges that should be addressed to move the field forward and conclude with a discussion of the need for additional interdisciplinary research.

[1]  Kristina Heinonen,et al.  Developing service research – paving the way to transdisciplinary research , 2016 .

[2]  Lia Patrício,et al.  Billions of impoverished people deserve to be better served: A call to action for the service research community , 2016 .

[3]  D. Bowen The changing role of employees in service theory and practice: An interdisciplinary view , 2016 .

[4]  Steven W. Rayburn Consumers' captive service experiences: it's YOU and ME , 2015 .

[5]  Kristina Heinonen,et al.  “Futurizing” smart service: implications for service researchers and managers , 2015 .

[6]  L. Harris,et al.  All Anglos are alike? A study of whinging Poms and bloody-minded Aussies , 2015 .

[7]  Sterling A. Bone,et al.  How Customer Participation in B2B Peer-to-Peer Problem-Solving Communities Influences the Need for Traditional Customer Service , 2015 .

[8]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index , 2015 .

[9]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  M. Subramony,et al.  Services Management Research , 2015 .

[11]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Call for Papers—In Search of a New Alignment in Service Research: An Unprecedented, Dual-Journal Call For Papers , 2014 .

[12]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  A Service Lens on Value Creation: Marketing's Role in Achieving Strategic Advantage , 2014 .

[13]  P. Marks Informal-chat tracker to design the perfect office , 2014 .

[14]  Glenn L. Christensen,et al.  Rejected, shackled, and alone: The impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self. , 2014 .

[15]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Service Systems Engineering , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[16]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  The road back to relevance: How to put marketing (and marketing scholars) back on the Top Managements’ agendas , 2014 .

[17]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Service Systems Engineering , 2014, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[18]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Value Co-Creation: Exploring Synergies Between Design for Service and Service Logic , 2014 .

[19]  Frank Siedlok,et al.  The Organization of Interdisciplinary Research: Modes, Drivers and Barriers , 2014 .

[20]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[21]  J. Spohrer,et al.  Marketing: a service science and arts perspective , 2014 .

[22]  B. Schneider,et al.  A Service Climate Synthesis and Future Research Agenda , 2014 .

[23]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities , 2014 .

[24]  Catherine Welch,et al.  Putting Process (Back) in: Research on the Internationalization Process of the Firm , 2014 .

[25]  Sali Li,et al.  Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article , 2013 .

[26]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  An agenda for service research at the base of the pyramid , 2013 .

[27]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Cancer resource centers as third places , 2013 .

[28]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Transformative Service Research: An Agenda for the Future , 2013 .

[29]  B. Looy,et al.  Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance , 2013 .

[30]  Dominik Mahr,et al.  Uncovering Collaborative Value Creation Patterns and Establishing Corresponding Customer Roles , 2013 .

[31]  H. Liao,et al.  Missing link in the service profit chain: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  An Exploration of Networks in Value Cocreation: A Service-Ecosystems View , 2012 .

[35]  João Mário Csillag,et al.  Service's scientific community: a social network analysis (1995‐2010) , 2012 .

[36]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles , 2012 .

[37]  Liliana L. Bove,et al.  Linking Service-Dominant Logic and Strategic Business Practice , 2012 .

[38]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Transformative Consumer Research: For Personal and Collective Well-Being , 2012 .

[39]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Special Issue – Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing , 2012 .

[40]  Per Echeverri,et al.  Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation , 2011 .

[41]  C. Grönroos Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis , 2011 .

[42]  Chris Raddats,et al.  Strategy and structure configurations for services within product-centric businesses , 2011 .

[43]  R. Fisk,et al.  Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting , 2011 .

[44]  Birgit Mager,et al.  Special Issue Editorial: Designing for Services , 2011 .

[45]  R. Lusch REFRAMING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A SERVICE‐DOMINANT LOGIC PERSPECTIVE , 2011 .

[46]  Chris Raddats,et al.  'Strategy and structure configurations within product-centric businesses' , 2011 .

[47]  Lin-Lin Chen International Journal of Design: Reaching the first milestone , 2011 .

[48]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  Service productivity, quality and innovation: Implications for service‐design practice and research , 2010 .

[49]  Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres,et al.  Not always co-creation: introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic , 2010 .

[50]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Managing Marketing Channel Multiplicity , 2010 .

[51]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[52]  Ravi Anupindi,et al.  Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers , 2010 .

[53]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Is Customer Participation in Value Creation a Double-Edged Sword? Evidence from Professional Financial Services across Cultures , 2010 .

[54]  T. Meiren,et al.  Testing of service concepts , 2010 .

[55]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Match or Mismatch: Strategy-Structure Configurations in the Service Business of Manufacturing Companies , 2010 .

[56]  L. G. Zomerdijk,et al.  Service Design for Experience-Centric Services , 2010 .

[57]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service , 2010 .

[58]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  A customer‐dominant logic of service , 2010 .

[59]  Saara A. Brax,et al.  Developing integrated solution offerings for remote diagnostics: A comparative case study of two manufacturers , 2009 .

[60]  A. Neely Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing , 2008 .

[61]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[62]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[63]  L. Berry,et al.  Health Care , 2007 .

[64]  Richard L. Priem A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation , 2007 .

[65]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[66]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service productivity: Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services , 2004 .

[67]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[68]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Tale of Two Countries’ Conservatism, Service Quality, and Feedback on Customer Satisfaction , 2004 .

[69]  Leigh Weiss,et al.  Coordination Networks within and Across Organizations: A Multi-Level Framework , 2004 .

[70]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[71]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[72]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[73]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Patients as partners in managing chronic disease , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[74]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[75]  R. Rust,et al.  Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable , 1995 .

[76]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[77]  Rikard Larsson,et al.  Organization and Customer: Managing Design and Coordination of Services , 1989 .

[78]  B. Schneider,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Customer Service Orientations in Manufacturing , 1989 .

[79]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[80]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[81]  David Anderson Creating New Services , 1982 .

[82]  Allison M. McCormack,et al.  Information Age , 1979 .

[83]  R B Chase,et al.  Where does the customer fit in a service operation? , 1978, Harvard business review.