Feasibility and Predictability of Perioperative PET and Estrogen Receptor Ligand in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

The presence of estrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer is a prognostic indicator for both disease-free and overall survival. 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) with PET is a noninvasive test for evaluation of ER expression and has been used for predicting response to endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to correlate 18F-FES PET and ER expression in patients with primary, operable breast cancer. Methods: Forty-eight patients were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board–approved protocol and signed an informed consent form. All patients had undergone 18F-FES PET preoperatively. Clinical characteristics, tumor characteristics, and treatment outcomes were recorded. Immunohistochemical analysis for ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) percentage expression (46 surgical, 2 core biopsy specimens) was performed. 18F-FES PET standardized uptake value (SUV) of the breast lesion was correlated with percentage immunohistochemistry ER and PgR expression. 18F-FES PET SUV was quantified, with a value of 1.5 or more considered positive, and ER and PgR was quantified, with 1% or more considered positive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was available for 44 patients (42 surgical, 2 core biopsy specimens). We used a microarray platform, and estrogen-related gene expression data (ESR1, ESR2, and PGR) were compared with 18F-FES PET SUV (Spearman rank correlation). Tumor size, ductal histology, grade, HER2-neu overexpression, PgR expression, estradiol level, body mass index (BMI), and lean BMI were compared with 18F-FES PET uptake using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Forty-eight patients completed our protocol, and 2 patients did not undergo surgery because bone metastases were identified preoperatively on 18F-FES PET. Eighty-three percent of our patients were stage I or II, with a median tumor size of 1.9 cm. Forty-one patients underwent a sentinel node biopsy. Twenty-one patients had nodal involvement. 18F-FES PET identified 5 patients with axillary nodal uptake (median SUV, 3.0; range, 1.7–6.9). These 5 patients had ER-positive breast cancer, and all had more than 4 positive nodes at the time of axillary node dissection. 18F-FES PET SUV was associated with immunohistochemistry ER expression. The sensitivity and specificity of the 18F-FES PET for the breast lesion were 0.85 and 0.75, respectively. Estrogen and progesterone gene expression (ESR1, ESR2, and PGR) was not associated with 18F-FES PET SUV (Spearman rank correlation). We found a significant correlation between 18F-FES PET SUV and tumor size (P = 0.0015) but not with ductal histology, grade, HER2-neu overexpression, PgR, estradiol, BMI, or lean BMI (logistic regression). ER expression (P < 0.001) and tumor size (P < 0.0001) were significant on multivariate regression analysis. Conclusion: 18F-FES PET SUV correlated with ER immunohistochemistry expression but not gene expression in our patients with early breast cancer. We found that size of primary tumor was significantly associated with 18F-FES PET SUV. 18F-FES PET is highly predictive for metastatic disease and helped in the identification of patients with metastatic disease in a preoperative setting.

[1]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[2]  Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2011, The Lancet.

[3]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography Reveals Differences in Pharmacodynamics of Aromatase Inhibitors, Tamoxifen, and Fulvestrant in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  K. Tonkin,et al.  Clinical production, stability studies and PET imaging with 16-alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) in ER positive breast cancer patients. , 2007, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  C. Geyer,et al.  Solving the dilemma of the immunohistochemical and other methods used for scoring estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor in patients with invasive breast carcinoma , 2005, Cancer.

[8]  M. Welch,et al.  Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[10]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron Tomographic Assessment of 16α-[18F] Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Uptake in Metastatic Breast Carcinoma , 1991 .

[12]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of 16 alpha-[18F] fluoro-17 beta-estradiol uptake in metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Mesiti,et al.  Do multiple oestrogen receptor assays give significant additional information for the management of breast cancer? , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  M. Brigden,et al.  Cellular distribution patterns of estrogen receptor in human breast cancer. , 1988, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[15]  M. Mintun,et al.  Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors. , 1988, Radiology.

[16]  T. Lemarchand-Béraud,et al.  The predictive value of estrogen and progesterone receptors' concentrations on the clinical behavior of breast cancer in women °clinical correlation on 547 patients , 1986, Cancer.

[17]  M. Welch,et al.  NCA 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol-17β: The effect of reaction vessel on fluorine-18 resolubilization, product yield, and effective specific activity , 1986 .

[18]  M. Welch,et al.  NCA 16 alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol-17 beta: the effect of reaction vessel on fluorine-18 resolubilization, product yield, and effective specific activity. , 1986, International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part A, Applied radiation and isotopes.

[19]  M. Welch,et al.  Preparation of four fluorine- 18-labeled estrogens and their selective uptakes in target tissues of immature rats. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.