Sustaining productivity of jatropha cultivation for biodiesel

Growth of Jatropha carcus in southern African countries is a new endeavor. Claims that jatropha has ability to grow in marginal lands, multiple benefits, potential to increase energy security and mitigate climate change, have motivated some governments, private organisations and individual farmers to invest in its production under different business models. This paper presents results of literature review on experiences of southern African countries on economic impact of growing jatropha for biodiesel production. These results provide lessons for the envisaged jatropha biodiesel production in Botswana as well as other countries intending to grow jatropha in the future. While the economic impacts of investing in jatropha production are country and project specific, the review revealed that most projects, especially commercial plantations, are not economically attractive to the extent that they have been abandoned in some countries. The study concludes by recommending the undertaking of agronomic and socio economic research to fully understand the performance of jatropha crop before embarking on large commercial production which may be risky.

[1]  International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) , 2018, Yearbook of International Cooperation on Environment and Development 1998–99.

[2]  F. X. Johnson,et al.  Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: drivers, impacts and priority policy areas , 2015 .

[3]  Jesper Eriksson,et al.  Economic Analysis on Electrification of Rural Villages in Eastern Zambia , 2013 .

[4]  A. Gasparatos Biofuels in Africa Impacts on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Human Well-being , 2012 .

[5]  L. German,et al.  Biofuel Investments in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Review of the Early Legal and Institutional Framework in Zambia , 2012 .

[6]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Considerations of Project Scale and Sustainability of Modern Bioenergy Systems in Uganda , 2012 .

[7]  Laura German,et al.  The Local Social and Environmental Impacts of Smallholder-Based Biofuel Investments in Zambia , 2011 .

[8]  Channing Arndt,et al.  Gender Implications of Biofuels Expansion in Africa : The Case of Mozambique , 2011 .

[9]  Alexandros Gasparatos,et al.  Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative , 2011 .

[10]  G. Borman An assessment of the economic sustainability of Jatropha-based biodiesel initiatives: implications for labour and rural livelihoods , 2011 .

[11]  K. Goswami,et al.  Economic Benefits and Costs of Jatropha Plantation in North-East India , 2011 .

[12]  Sharachchandra Lele,et al.  Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India: Viability, livelihood trade-offs, and latent conflict , 2010 .

[13]  J. Clancy Are biofuels pro-poor? Assessing the evidence , 2008 .

[14]  André Faaij,et al.  Biomass and bioenergy supply from Mozambique , 2006 .

[15]  D. Byerlee,et al.  Ex Ante Economic Analysis in AKIS Projects : Methods and Guidelines for Good Practice , 2000 .

[16]  A. Basiago,et al.  Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice , 1998 .

[17]  E. Mayer Making Development Sustainable Redefining Institutions Policy And Economics , 2016 .

[18]  A. Segerstedt,et al.  Biofuels and the sustainability challenge: a global assessment of sustainability issues, trends and policies for biofuels and related feedstocks. , 2013 .

[19]  H. Gunatilake Financial and Economic Assessment of Biodiesel Production and use in India , 2012 .

[20]  G. Maltitz,et al.  Assessing the Sustainability of Bioenergy Projects in Developing Countries: A Framework for Policy Evaluation , 2010 .

[21]  L. Verchot,et al.  JATROPHA BIODIESEL PRODUCTION AND USE , 2008 .

[22]  A. Dufey,et al.  Biofuels, agriculture and poverty reduction. , 2007 .

[23]  A. Dufey International trade in biofuels: good for development? And good for environment? , 2007 .

[24]  J. Holmberg,et al.  Making development sustainable : redefining institutions, policy, and economics , 1992 .