Intermodality judgments of signal duration
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ss were asked to make both inter- and intramodal comparisons of the durations of lights and tones, in a two-alternative, forced-choice situation, with signal durations between 0.5 sec. and 1.6 sec The probability of a correct judgment was higher for intra- than for intermodal comparisons and was highest for intra-auditory comparisons. For intermodal pairs of signals with durations 0.5 sec. and 0.6 sec, there was a greater than chance probability of judging the visual signal longer than the auditory.
[1] S. Goldstone,et al. AUDITORY AND VISUAL TIME JUDGMENT. , 1964, The Journal of general psychology.
[2] W. Bevan,et al. The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: cross-modal comparison and interaction. , 1961, American Journal of Psychology.
[3] S. Goldstone,et al. DIRECT COMPARISON OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL DURATIONS. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.
[4] S. Goldstone,et al. Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.