A study on the uplift mechanism of Tongjiezi dam using a coupled hydro-mechanical model

During filling in 1992 of the Tongjiezi reservoir, in Southwest China, it was noticed that the dam body and the rock masses on the right side of the valley were uplifted up to 22.2 mm and 24.3 mm respectively. After reservoir filling in 1993, the uplift continued, but the rate decreased, and the measured maximum uplift increased from 22.2 mm to 27.5 mm in the dam body and from 24.3 mm to 28.9 mm in the rock masses from 1993 to 2004. Based on the geological features of the dam site and observed geomechanics data, a numerical method is used to evaluate the representative elementary volume (REV) and to identify the parameters related to the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the rock mass. Furthermore, a coupled hydro-mechanical model is presented to describe the uplift process. The simulated results agree well with those measured. In addition, the time-dependent deformation is studied in the laboratory and numerically. It is concluded that, with the specific hydrogeological conditions at the Tongjiezi dam site, hydro-mechanical coupling during and after the reservoir impoundment is the main factor contributing to the uplift, and the time-dependent deformation is due to the rheological behavior of rock masses under seepage pressure.

[1]  A. Karakas Practical Rock Engineering , 2008 .

[2]  Richard A. Schultz,et al.  Relative scale and the strength and deformability of rock masses , 1996 .

[3]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system , 2004 .

[4]  Richard E. Goodman,et al.  Methods of Geological Engineering in Discontinuous Rocks , 1975 .

[5]  G. Kh. Khakimova Some factors affecting vertical displacements of the foundation of the Inguri arch dam , 1982 .

[6]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Engineering Rock Mechanics: An Introduction to the Principles , 2000 .

[7]  Lanru Jing,et al.  A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering , 2003 .

[8]  John V. Smith Determining the size and shape of blocks from linear sampling for geotechnical rock mass classification and assessment , 2004 .

[9]  V. I. Bronshtein State of the arch dam and foundation of the Inguri hydroelectric station , 1994 .

[10]  Alexander Lavrov,et al.  The Kaiser effect in rocks : principles and stress estimation techniques , 2003 .

[11]  Numerical examination of empirical rock-mass classification systems , 1997 .

[12]  Cenka Christova Stress field in the Ryukyu–Kyushu Wadati–Benioff zone by inversion of earthquake focal mechanisms , 2004 .

[13]  Mahendra Singh,et al.  Empirical methods to estimate the strength of jointed rock masses , 2005 .

[14]  Fuzhang Yan,et al.  The uplift mechanism of the rock masses around the Jiangya dam after reservoir inundation, China , 2004 .

[15]  Pinnaduwa Kulatilake,et al.  Estimation of REV size and three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor for a fractured rock mass through a single well packer test and discrete fracture fluid flow modeling , 2002 .

[16]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems , 1995 .

[17]  Herbert H. Einstein,et al.  MODEL STUDIES ON MECHANICS OF JOINTED ROCK , 1973 .

[18]  G. Yu. Berdichevskii,et al.  Use of a mathematical model for interpreting data of on-site observations of the arch dam at the Inguri hydroelectric station , 1992 .

[19]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[20]  Bhawani Singh,et al.  Rock Mass Classification: A Practical Approach in Civil Engineering , 1999 .

[21]  S. A. Berezinskii,et al.  Condition of the concrete dam of the Toktogul hydroelectric station according to on-site observation data , 1985 .

[22]  C. A. Tang,et al.  Coupled analysis of flow, stress and damage (FSD) in rock failure , 2002 .

[23]  T. Ramamurthy A geo-engineering classification for rocks and rock masses , 2004 .