Endothelial cell responses to micropillar substrates of varying dimensions and stiffness.

In the vascular niche, the extracellular matrix (ECM) provides a structural scaffold with a rich ligand landscape of essential matrix proteins that supports the organization and stabilization of endothelial cells (ECs) into functional blood vessels. Many of the physical interactions between ECs and macromolecular components of the ECM occur at both the micron and submicron scale. In addition, the elasticity of the ECM has been shown to be a critical factor in the progress of the angiogenic cascade. Here, we sought to determine the effect of substrate topography and elasticity (stiffness) on EC behavior. Utilizing a unique SiO(2) substrate with an array of micropillars, we first demonstrate that micropillars with heights >3 μm significantly decrease EC adhesion and spreading. Fibronectin (Fn) patterning of 1 μm high micropillars enabled EC adhesion onto the micropillars and promoted alignment in a single-cell chain manner. We then developed a robust method to generate a soft micropillar substrate array made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), similar to the SiO(2) substrate. Finally, we examined the kinetics of EC adhesion and spreading on the soft PDMS substrates compared to the stiff SiO(2) substrates. Culturing cells on the PDMS substrates demonstrated an enhanced EC elongation and alignment when compared to stiff SiO(2) with similar topographical features. We conclude that the elongation and alignment of ECs is coregulated by substrate topography and stiffness and can be harnessed to guide vascular organization.

[1]  J. Hunt,et al.  Upregulation of matrix and adhesion molecules induced by controlled topography , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[2]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  R. Mecham,et al.  Vascular extracellular matrix and arterial mechanics. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[4]  P Vadgama,et al.  Influence of nanopatterns on endothelial cell adhesion: Enhanced cell retention under shear stress. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  S. Gerecht,et al.  Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography , 2008, Advanced materials.

[6]  M. Horton,et al.  Collagen fibrils: nanoscale ropes. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Kyung-Jin Jang,et al.  Adhesion assays of endothelial cells on nanopatterned surfaces within a microfluidic channel. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[9]  Finn Skou Pedersen,et al.  The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[10]  E. Van Obberghen-Schilling,et al.  Fibronectin and tenascin-C: accomplices in vascular morphogenesis during development and tumor growth. , 2011, The International journal of developmental biology.

[11]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  Combinatorial and High‐Throughput Screening of Biomaterials , 2011, Advanced materials.

[12]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Modulation of human vascular endothelial cell behaviors by nanotopographic cues. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[13]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Guiding endothelial progenitor cell tube formation using patterned fibronectin surfaces , 2010 .

[14]  D E Ingber,et al.  Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  G. Davis,et al.  Coordinate induction of the actin cytoskeletal regulatory proteins gelsolin, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, and profilin during capillary morphogenesis in vitro. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[16]  G. Davis,et al.  This Review Is Part of a Thematic Series on Vascular Cell Diversity, Which Includes the following Articles: Heart Valve Development: Endothelial Cell Signaling and Differentiation Molecular Determinants of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Diversity Endothelial/pericyte Interactions Endothelial Extracellu , 2022 .

[17]  T. Webster,et al.  Increased endothelial cell adhesion and elongation on micron-patterned nano-rough poly(dimethylsiloxane) films , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[18]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Direct quantification of the flexibility of type I collagen monomer. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[19]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  Nanoscale measurements of the assembly of collagen to fibrils. , 2010, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[20]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[22]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[23]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Mechanics of cell spreading within 3D-micropatterned environments. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[24]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Fibronectin fibrillogenesis: a paradigm for extracellular matrix assembly. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz,et al.  A combinatorial screening of human fibroblast responses on micro-structured surfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous force regulation of endothelial cell behavior. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  A. F. Recum,et al.  The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants , 1996 .

[28]  K J Gooch,et al.  The relative magnitudes of endothelial force generation and matrix stiffness modulate capillary morphogenesis in vitro. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[29]  S. Bauer,et al.  Narrow window in nanoscale dependent activation of endothelial cell growth and differentiation on TiO2 nanotube surfaces. , 2009, Nano letters.

[30]  R. Hynes,et al.  Fibronectins are essential for heart and blood vessel morphogenesis but are dispensable for initial specification of precursor cells. , 1997, Blood.

[31]  Lotte Markert,et al.  Identification of distinct topographical surface microstructures favoring either undifferentiated expansion or differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Stem cells and development.

[32]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[33]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[34]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  The effect of TiO2 nanotubes on endothelial function and smooth muscle proliferation. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[35]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[36]  P WEISS,et al.  Experiments on cell and axon orientation in vitro; the role of colloidal exudates in tissue organization. , 1945, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[37]  R. Hynes Cell–matrix adhesion in vascular development , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[38]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[39]  M. Yoder,et al.  Collagen matrix physical properties modulate endothelial colony forming cell-derived vessels in vivo. , 2010, Microvascular research.

[40]  K. Leong,et al.  Substrate topography shapes cell function , 2009 .

[41]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Enhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfaces. , 2008, Nano letters.

[42]  Astrid Magenau,et al.  The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  H. Erickson,et al.  Fibronectin molecule visualized in electron microscopy: a long, thin, flexible strand , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[45]  W. Su,et al.  Micropillar substrate influences the cellular attachment and laminin expression. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[46]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[47]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[48]  M. Cecchini,et al.  Control of initial endothelial spreading by topographic activation of focal adhesion kinase , 2011 .

[49]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Alterations in gene expression of human vascular endothelial cells associated with nanotopographic cues. , 2010, Biomaterials.