Tensile bond between bone and titanium: a reappraisal of osseointegration.

When Branemark in the 1970s established the term osseointegration, this implied a direct chemical bond between a titanium implant and bone. However, ultrastructural studies seemed not to support this idea, and osseointegration came to be defined as the absence of interfering fibrous tissue. Titanium was therefore described as bioinert rather than bioactive. We now demonstrate mechanically a chemical bond between bone and titanium, using unloaded cp titanium plates, similar to those used in previous studies on prosthetic loosening. Tensile force can be transmitted only by chemical bonds. Bone-bonding was therefore evaluated by a detachment test. The plates were developed so that a flat titanium surface touched traumatized bone and the rest of the detachable part had no contact with surrounding tissue. The titanium plates were either polished and sterilized in an autoclave or treated in 4 M NaOH and then heated to 600 degrees C according to Yan et al. (1996). After 4 weeks, the plates were separated from the bone by a perpendicular traction force. The detaching load of the untreated titanium plates never exceeded 0.03 MPa, whereas with treatment it increased to median 0.8 MPa, with bone remaining attached to parts of the plates after detachment. Our findings confirm that a chemical bond can be obtained within 4 weeks with the described pretreatment. It may occur also without treatment, after a longer implantation time.

[1]  B Lowenberg,et al.  The bone-titanium interface in vitro. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  S D Cook,et al.  Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  G Boivin,et al.  Osseointegration of metallic implants. II. Transmission electron microscopy in the rabbit. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  I Bab,et al.  The ultrastructure of the interface between a glass ceramic and bone. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  P. Branemark,et al.  Clinical aspects of osseointegration in joint replacement. A histological study of titanium implants. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  T Kitsugi,et al.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  K Nakanishi,et al.  The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  T. Yamamuro,et al.  Bone-bonding behavior of titanium alloy evaluated mechanically with detaching failure load. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  L Linder,et al.  Osseointegration of metallic implants. I. Light microscopy in the rabbit. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  T. Goto,et al.  Bone bonding behavior of titanium and its alloys when coated with titanium oxide (TiO2) and titanium silicate (Ti5Si3). , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegration of titanium implants. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[13]  L. Linder Ultrastructure of the bone-cement and the bone-metal interface. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  S D Cook,et al.  The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  U. Joos,et al.  Mechanisms and structure of the bond between bone and hydroxyapatite ceramics. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.