The FeDiNAR Project: Using Augmented Reality to Turn Mistakes into Learning Opportunities

This chapter describes FeDiNAR (German acronym for Didactical Use of Errors with the Help of Augmented Reality)—an ongoing project, which focuses on errors as a highly beneficial learning opportunity. The aim of the project is the development and evaluation of an Augmented Reality (AR) based learning system with associated learning scenarios in order to make the most efficient use of a learner’s mistakes for individual competence acquisition. The chapter begins with an introduction of the education-based main idea in combination with a selection of didactical theories, schemes and intervention levels. Next, the authors define the error term for the project and illustrate the setup of the proposed learning system in general and the technologies involved. They then present their prototype, which includes a range of actuators and sensors, offering many possibilities to define scenarios in which the presented system will apply. The chapter continues with the underlying technological foundation based on digital twins enabling to use augmented reality for the presented didactical concept and concludes with the findings after the first project phase.

[1]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[2]  Shmuel Ellis,et al.  After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Nicholas J. Dingle,et al.  PIPE2: a tool for the performance evaluation of generalised stochastic Petri Nets , 2009, PERV.

[4]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[5]  Manu Kapur Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning , 2016 .

[6]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[7]  K. Lewin,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1927 .

[8]  Jürgen Roßmann,et al.  Digital Twins: Assisting and Supporting Cooperation in Human-Robot Teams , 2018, 2018 15th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV).

[9]  M. Eraut Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  M. Dresel,et al.  Positive beliefs about errors as an important element of adaptive individual dealing with errors during academic learning , 2018 .

[11]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Reliability evaluation of systems with critical human error , 1984 .

[12]  James Lyle Peterson,et al.  Petri net theory and the modeling of systems , 1981 .

[13]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Self as an epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. , 1992 .

[14]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[15]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Learning from productive failure , 2015 .

[16]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve , 2005 .

[17]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  The Phenotype of Erroneous Actions , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[18]  Lars Heinemann,et al.  Competence Development and Assessment in TVET (COMET) , 2013 .

[19]  Stephan Abele,et al.  Diagnostic Problem-Solving Process in Professional Contexts: Theory and Empirical Investigation in the Context of Car Mechatronics Using Computer-Generated Log-Files , 2017, Vocations and Learning.