Toward Patient-Specific Computational Study of Aortic Diseases: A Population Based Shape Modeling Approach

Patient-specific computational study of aortic disease provides a powerful means for diagnosis and pre-operative planning. However, creating patient-specific computational models can be time-consuming due to the fact that anatomical geometries extracted from clinical imaging data are often incomplete and noisy. This paper presents an approach for constructing statistical shape models (SSMs) for aortic surfaces with the eventual goal of mapping the mean aorta geometries to raw surface data obtained from the clinical images for each new patient so that patient-specific models can be automatically constructed.The input aortic models in this study come in the form of triangle meshes generated from CT scans on 6 patients. Statistical models with modes that characterize the variation pattern are found after optimizing the group-wise correspondence across the aorta training set. We use the direct reparametrization approach to efficiently manipulate shape correspondence. We use B-spline based differentiable shape representation for the training set and use the adjoint method for deriving analytical gradients in a gradient based approach for manipulating the shape correspondence to minimize the description length of the resulting SSM. Our numerical result shows that the evaluation measures of the optimized statistical model have been significantly enhanced.Copyright © 2014 by ASME

[1]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Nonrigid 2-D/3-D Registration for Patient Specific Bronchoscopy Simulation With Statistical Shape Modeling: Phantom Validation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A fast and simple stretch-minimizing mesh parameterization , 2004, Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004..

[3]  Rhodri H. Davies,et al.  Learning Shape: Optimal Models for Analysing Natural Variability , 2004 .

[4]  Stéphane Lavallée,et al.  Building a Complete Surface Model from Sparse Data Using Statistical Shape Models: Application to Computer Assisted Knee Surgery System , 1998, MICCAI.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Training Models of Shape from Sets of Examples , 1992, BMVC.

[6]  R Jacobs,et al.  Automated osteoporosis risk assessment by dentists: a new pathway to diagnosis. , 2007, Bone.

[7]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Detecting Reduced Bone Mineral Density From Dental Radiographs Using Statistical Shape Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[8]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Shape , 1998 .

[10]  Paul Schmidt,et al.  Bioprosthetic heart valve heterograft biomaterials: structure, mechanical behavior and computational simulation , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[11]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images , 1993, IPMI.

[13]  J. Langenderfer,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Knee Muscle Moment Arms: Effects of Methods, Origin–Insertion, and Kinematic Variability , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[16]  J. Geelen ON HOW TO DRAW A GRAPH , 2012 .

[17]  S. Pal,et al.  Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: A probabilistic study , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Paul J Rullkoetter,et al.  Efficient probabilistic representation of tibiofemoral soft tissue constraint , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  P P Smyth,et al.  Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with active shape models. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  Minimum Description Length Principle , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[22]  Ben H. Thacker,et al.  Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software , 2000 .

[23]  Saikat Pal,et al.  Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Fernán Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quirós,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of the Distal Femur: A Validity Method for Allograft Selection Using a Virtual Bone Bank , 2010, MedInfo.

[25]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Statistical models of shape - optimisation and evaluation , 2008 .

[26]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[27]  D. Hawkes,et al.  Tracking liver motion using 3-D ultrasound and a surface based statistical shape model , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[28]  Hans Henrik Thodberg,et al.  Minimum Description Length Shape and Appearance Models , 2003, IPMI.

[29]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic Landmark Generation for Point Distribution Models , 1994, BMVC.

[30]  Manasi Datar,et al.  Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Segmenting Lung Fields in Serial Chest Radiographs Using Both Population-Based and Patient-Specific Shape Statistics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .