`Nuts and Bolts and People'

Engineers have two types of stories about what constitutes `real' engineering. In sociological terms, one is technicist, the other heterogeneous. How and where boundaries are drawn between `the technical' and `the social' in engineering identities and practices is a central concern for feminist technology studies, given the strong marking of sociality as feminine and technology as masculine. I explore these themes, drawing on ethnographic observations of building design engineering. This is a profoundly heterogeneous and networked engineering practice, which entails troubled boundary drawing and identities for the individuals involved — evident in interactions between engineers and architects, and among engineers, especially around management and design. Many engineers cleave to a technicist engineering identity, and even those who embrace the heterogeneous reality of their actual work oscillate between or straddle, not always comfortably, the two identities. There are complex gender tensions, as well as professional tensions, at work here — associated with distinct versions of hegemonic masculinity, with the technical/social dualism, and with what I call `gender in/authenticity' issues. I conclude that technicist engineering identities persist in part because they converge with (and perform) available masculinities, and that women's (perceived and felt) membership as `real' engineers is likely to be more fragile than men's. Engineering as a profession must foreground and celebrate the heterogeneity of engineering work. Improving the representation of women in engineering requires promoting more heterogeneous versions of gender as well as engineering.

[1]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions , 2006 .

[2]  Juan C. Lucena,et al.  Knowledge and professional identity in engineering: code‐switching and the metrics of progress , 2004 .

[3]  Wendy Faulkner,et al.  “I’m No Athlete [but] I Can Make This Thing Dance!”—Men’s Pleasures in Technology , 2003 .

[4]  Ruth Klinov.  Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner , 2002 .

[5]  R. Crompton,et al.  Restructuring gender relations and employment : the decline of the male breadwinner , 2001 .

[6]  W. Faulkner.  The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies , 2001 .

[7]  M. Lohan.  Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies , 2000 .

[8]  W. Faulkner.  Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering , 2000 .

[9]  Judy Wajcman,et al.  Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945 (review) , 2000 .

[10]  J. Wajcman.  Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: , 2000 .

[11]  J. R. Griffin,et al.  The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America , 2000 .

[12]  W. Faulkner.  The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to Engineers , 2000 .

[13]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .

[14]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  ENGINEERING GENDER−GENDERING ENGINEERING: A CULTURAL MODEL FOR BELONGING , 1999 .

[15]  Julia Evetts,et al.  Managing the technology but not the organization: women and career in engineering , 1998 .

[16]  Judy Wajcman,et al.  Managing Like a Man: Women and Men in Corporate Management , 1998 .

[17]  Gary Lee Downey,et al.  The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers , 1998 .

[18]  S. Halford,et al.  Gender, Careers and Organisations , 1997 .

[19]  Beverly Marshall-Goodell,et al.  Gender and Career in Science and Engineering. , 1997 .

[20]  Arwen Mohun,et al.  The Shoulders We Stand On and the View From Here: Historiography and Directions for Research , 1997, Technology and Culture.

[21]  M. Kimmel,et al.  Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. , 1997 .

[22]  Peter Meiksins,et al.  Engineering Labour: Technical Workers in Comparative Perspective , 1996 .

[23]  Merete Lie,et al.  Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender? , 1995 .

[24]  Ulf Mellström.  Engineering lives : Technology, time and space in a male-centred world , 1995 .

[25]  W. Faulkner.  Conceptualizing Knowledge Used in Innovation: A Second Look at the Science-Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[26]  Fergus Murray.  A separate reality: science, technology and Masculinity , 1994 .

[27]  C. Cockburn.  The circuit of technology Gender, identity and power , 1994 .

[28]  Tore Kristensen,et al.  Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness , 1994 .

[29]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[30]  Diana E. Forsythe,et al.  Engineering Knowledge: The Construction of Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence , 1993 .

[31]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  The roles of science in technological innovation , 1993 .

[32]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[33]  M. Savage.  Women's Expertise, Men's Authority: Gendered Organisations and the Contemporary Middle Classes , 1991, Sociological review monograph.

[34]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[35]  Judith S. Mcilwee,et al.  MEN, WOMEN, AND THE CULTURE OF ENGINEERING , 1991 .

[36]  Raewyn Connell,et al.  Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. , 1991 .

[37]  D. Smith,et al.  Doing It the Hard Way: Investigations of Gender and Technology , 1990 .

[38]  T. P. Hughes.  The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera , 1986 .

[39]  Peter Whalley,et al.  The Social Production of Technical Work: The Case of British Engineers , 1986 .

[40]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[41]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[42]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  The Death Of Nature: Women, Ecology, And The Scientific Revolution , 1981 .

[43]  Brian Easlea.  Science and sexual oppression: Patriarchy's confrontation with woman and nature , 1981 .

[44]  Samuel C. Florman,et al.  The Existential Pleasures of Engineering , 1976 .