Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus

Abstract Use of food resources by herbivores depends on intrinsic constraints, essentially body size and morpho-physiological characteristics, which determine the range of foods they tolerate and environmental constraints, such as seasonality and interspecific interactions, which determine the availability of resources. We analysed a collection of rumen contents samples from sympatric populations of red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus and tested several theoretical predictions relating to the impact of intrinsic and environmental constraints on diet composition, diversity and similarity. Red deer consumed more slowly digestible, fibrous forage than roe deer and had a more diverse diet throughout the year, which supports predictions deriving from specific body size and morpho-physiological characteristics. In conformity with the optimal foraging theory, both species consumed more slowly digestible forage in times of low food availability (i.e. during winter) than during the rest of the year. An increase in diet similarity in winter, along with predictions from the theory on competitive interaction processes, led us to assume that food resources were not limiting and that exploitative competition between red and roe deer was unlikely in our study area. We underline the importance of studies of the use of food resources by sympatric herbivores in answering applied ecological questions at the local scale, and we suggest that the Euclidean geometrical approach we used is particularly well suited for the analysis of resource matrices, a common end-product of long-term field data gathering on the feeding habits of animals.

[1]  R. Hofmann,et al.  GRAZER OR BROWSER: A CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE STOMACH-STRUCTURE AND FEEDING HABITS OF EAST AFRICAN RUMINANTS , 1972 .

[2]  J. Thioulouse,et al.  The ade 4 package-I : One-table methods by , 2004 .

[3]  F. Reimoser Steering the impacts of ungulates on temperate forests , 2003 .

[4]  J. Thioulouse,et al.  The diet of feral cats (Felis catus L.) at five sites on the Grande Terre, Kerguelen archipelago , 2002, Polar Biology.

[5]  B. Bobek Summer food as the factor limiting roe deer population size , 1977, Nature.

[6]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[7]  A. D. Chamrad,et al.  A point frame for sampling rumen contents , 1964 .

[8]  S. Dolédec Les peuplements de macroinvertébrés benthiques du cours inférieur de l'Ardèche : dynamique spatio-temporelle , 1986 .

[9]  D. E. Spalinger,et al.  Adaptation of ruminants to browse and grass diets: are anatomical-based browser-grazer interpretations valid? , 1995, Oecologia.

[10]  A. Mysterud Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia , 2000, Oecologia.

[11]  F. Klein,et al.  Consequences of increased deer browsing winter on silver fir and spruce regeneration in the Southern Vosges mountains: Implications for forest management , 2005 .

[12]  R. Putman Competition and Resource Partitioning in Temperate Ungulate Assemblies , 1996, Chapman & Hall Wildlife Ecology and Behaviour Series.

[13]  I. Gordon,et al.  The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants , 1994, Oecologia.

[14]  S. Wieren,et al.  Digestive strategies of ruminants and non ruminants. , 1995 .

[15]  R. Sabatier,et al.  Refined approximations to permutation tests for multivariate inference , 1995 .

[16]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  The ade4 package - I : One-table methods , 2004 .

[17]  H. Ahrens,et al.  On Two Measures of Unbalancedness in a One-Way Model and Their Relation to Efficiency , 1981 .

[18]  P. Abrams SOME COMMENTS ON MEASURING NICHE OVERLAP , 1980 .

[19]  J. Connell Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[20]  R. Andersen,et al.  The European roe deer: the biology of success. , 2000 .

[21]  R. Hofmann Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system , 1989, Oecologia.

[22]  C. Braak,et al.  Principal Components Biplots and Alpha and Beta Diversity , 1983 .

[23]  E. H. Simpson Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[24]  E. Pianka The structure of lizard communities , 1973 .

[25]  G. F. Gause,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF VITO VOLTERRA'S MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE. , 1934, Science.

[26]  Ruth G. Shaw,et al.  Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview , 1993 .

[27]  F. Reimoser,et al.  Impact of ungulates on forest vegetation and its dependence on the silvicultural system , 1996 .

[28]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[29]  F. Reimoser,et al.  Forest restoration and browsing impact by roe deer , 2002 .

[30]  N. Owen‐Smith,et al.  What Should a Clever Ungulate Eat? , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[31]  É. Baubet Biologie du sanglier en montagne : biodémographie, occupation de l'espace et régime alimentaire , 1998 .

[32]  D. Chessel,et al.  Biplot presentation of diet composition data : an alternative for fish stomach contents analysis , 2000 .

[33]  G. Hosey Annual foods of the Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the south of England , 2009 .

[34]  L. Lawlor,et al.  Structure and Stability in Natural and Randomly Constructed Competitive Communities , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[35]  H. Verheyden-Tixier,et al.  Variations of diet composition of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Europe , 2001 .

[36]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats , 1970 .

[37]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Can we use the young : female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model , 2005 .

[38]  W. F. Boer,et al.  Large herbivores that strive mightily but eat and drink as friends , 1990, Oecologia.

[39]  G. Hardin The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[40]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap. , 1971, Ecology.

[41]  Yvonne Freeh,et al.  An R and S–PLUS Companion to Applied Regression , 2004 .

[42]  J. Ellis,et al.  Errata: Feeding Ecology and Niche Separation in Some Native and Domestic Ungulates on the shortgrass Prairie , 1981 .

[43]  K. Gabriel,et al.  The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis , 1971 .

[44]  M. Clauss,et al.  Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physicomechanical characteristics of forage. A reevaluation of an old debate and a new hypothesis , 2003 .

[45]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  Rythmes saisonniers et composantes stationnelles en milieu aquatique. I: Description d'un plan d'observation complet par projection de variables , 1987 .

[46]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[47]  R. B. Root The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher , 1967 .

[48]  J. Wiens On Competition and Variable Environment , 1977 .

[49]  F. Klein,et al.  Is browsing the major factor of silver fir decline in the Vosges Mountains of France , 2005 .

[50]  P. V. Soest Allometry and ecology of feeding behavior and digestive capacity in herbivores: a review , 1996 .

[51]  T. Schoener The Controversy over Interspecific Competition , 1982 .

[52]  J. Diamond Niche Shifts and the Rediscovery of Interspecific Competition , 1978 .

[53]  B. Grant,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Feeding Habits of Darwin's Ground Finches , 1978 .

[54]  P. Duncan,et al.  Are European roe deer browsers ? A review of variations in the composition of their diets , 1996, Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie).

[55]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Sex‐ and age‐dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest , 2002 .

[56]  T. A. Hanley The nutritional basis for food selection by ungulates. , 1982 .

[57]  P. Raven,et al.  Biology of Plants. , 1971 .

[58]  F. Klein,et al.  Domaine vital diurne et déplacements de biches (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de La Petite Pierre (Bas-Rhin) , 1997 .

[59]  L. L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography. , 1959 .

[60]  M. Hermy,et al.  Impact of season, habitat and research techniques on diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a review , 1999 .

[61]  R. Bell A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti , 1971 .

[62]  Montague W. Demment,et al.  A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[63]  M. González-Hernández,et al.  Nutritional attributes of understory plants known as components of deer diets. , 1999 .

[64]  E. Pianka,et al.  Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .

[65]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[66]  J. Gaillard,et al.  What factors shape sexual size dimorphism in ungulates , 1999 .

[67]  C. Ammer Impact of ungulates on structure and dynamics of natural regeneration of mixed mountain forests in the Bavarian Alps , 1996 .

[68]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[69]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .

[70]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[71]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .

[72]  Douglas H. Johnson The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing , 1999 .

[73]  H. Fritz,et al.  Influence of hurricane Lothar on red and roe deer winter diets in the Northern Vosges, France , 2006 .

[74]  T. Schoener Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[75]  P. Jarman,et al.  The Social Organisation of Antelope in Relation To Their Ecology , 1974 .

[76]  B. Dumont,et al.  Seasonal variations of Red Deer selectivity on a mixed forest edge , 2005 .

[77]  J. Gower Multivariate Analysis and Multidimensional Geometry , 1967 .

[78]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[79]  J. Latham,et al.  Comparative feeding ecology of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scottish plantation forests , 1999 .

[80]  I. Gordon,et al.  Resource partitioning by ungulates on the Isle of Rhum , 1989, Oecologia.

[81]  P. Sale Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition , 1974, Oecologia.