Multiple Imputation of the Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976–2005

The Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), assembled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), have for many years represented the most valuable source of information on the patterns and trends in murder and non-negligent manslaughter. Despite their widespread use by researchers and policy makers alike, these data are not completely without their limitations, the most important of which involves missing or incomplete incident reports. In this analysis, we develop methods for addressing missing data in the 1976–2005 SHR cumulative file, related to both non-reports (unit missingness) and incomplete reports (item missingness). For incomplete case data (that is, missing characteristics on victims, offenders or incidents), we implement a multiple imputation (MI) approach based on a log-linear model for incomplete multivariate categorical data. Then, to adjust for unit missingness, we adopt a weighting scheme linked to FBI annual estimates of homicide counts by state and National Center for Health Statistics mortality data on decedent characteristics in coroners’ reports for deaths classified as homicide. The result is a fully-imputed SHR database for 1976–2005. This paper examines the effects of MI and case weighting on victim/offender/incident characteristics, including standard errors of parameter estimates resulting from imputation uncertainty.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse , 1986 .

[2]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics , 1993 .

[3]  M. Riedel.  Stranger Violence: Perspectives, Issues, and Problems , 1987 .

[4]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  A LOG-MULTIPLICATIVE ASSOCIATION MODEL FOR ALLOCATING HOMICIDES WITH UNKNOWN VICTIM/OFFENDER RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[5]  Michael G. Maxfield,et al.  CIRCUMSTANCES IN SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS: VARIETY AND VALIDITY* , 1989 .

[6]  Fred C. Pampel,et al.  Intimacy and homicide: compensating for missing data in the shr* , 2000 .

[7]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 2002 .

[8]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[9]  C. Rennison.  Intimate Partner Violence, 1993-2001: (379462004-001) , 2003 .

[10]  J. Fox.  Missing Data Problems in the SHR , 2004 .

[11]  Marc Riedel,et al.  Counting Stranger Homicides , 1998 .

[12]  Nicholas J. Horton,et al.  Multiple Imputation in Practice , 2001 .

[13]  R. Flewelling.  A Nonparametric Imputation Approach for Dealing With Missing Variables in SHR Data , 2004 .

[14]  D. Rubin.  INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[15]  Kirk R. Williams,et al.  FAMILY, ACQUAINTANCE, AND STRANGER HOMICIDE: ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES FOR RATE CALCULATIONS* , 1987 .

[16]  Wendy C. Regoeczi,et al.  The Application of Missing Data Estimation Models to the Problem of Unknown Victim/Offender Relationships in Homicide Cases , 2003 .

[17]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[18]  Robert K. Triest,et al.  Alternative Methods for CPS Income Imputation , 1986 .

[19]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Design of a General and Flexible System for Handling Nonresponse in Sample Surveys , 2004 .