Composite binocular perception from dichoptic stimulus arrays with similar ensemble information

We view the world through laterally displaced eyes that generate two streams of image signals differing slightly in their perspectives of the visual scene. The brain derives three-dimensional structures from these two image streams by establishing binocular matches and computing image disparities between the two eyes’ views. Since the binocular matching problem can have multiple, alternative solutions, vision relies on several strategies to determine the most probable matches. The current study investigated whether the visual system might utilize regularities among neighbouring features (feature ensembles) when confronting this problem. We hypothesized that binocular perception with unlikely, anomalous ensembles would indicate unsuccessful binocular matches. We made dichoptic stimulus arrays of coloured circles and manipulated the colour similarity of stimulus items to produce probable or unusual ensembles when superimposed. Using binocular rivalry as a proxy index, we found that composite perception of dichoptic arrays was more stable when the stimulus items shared similar colours, and that unusual ensembles induced binocular rivalry. Our results suggest that binocular ensembles can be utilized to detect unsuccessful binocular matches, thus uncovering a potentially useful supplemental strategy for identifying binocular matches when viewing potentially confusing visual scenes containing redundant visual features.

[1]  David Alais,et al.  Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Inattention Abolishes Binocular Rivalry , 2012, Psychological science.

[3]  Matthew W Self,et al.  Interocularly merged face percepts eliminate binocular rivalry , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Inna Tsirlin,et al.  Stereoscopic transparency: constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Efficient Coding Theory Predicts a Tilt Aftereffect from Viewing Untilted Patterns , 2016, Current Biology.

[6]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[7]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Utrocular discrimination is not sufficient for utrocular identification , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  J P Frisby,et al.  PMF: A Stereo Correspondence Algorithm Using a Disparity Gradient Limit , 1985, Perception.

[10]  Randolph Blake,et al.  A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Teghtsoonian THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  S. McKee,et al.  The role of retinal correspondence in stereoscopic matching , 1988, Vision Research.

[13]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00091-1 , 1998 .

[14]  S. C. Chong,et al.  Less Is More: Semantic Information Survives Interocular Suppression When Attention Is Diverted , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  Efficient stereo coding in the multiscale representation , 1994 .

[16]  A. B. Nutt Binocular vision. , 1945, The British orthoptic journal.

[17]  A. Franklin,et al.  Effects of ensemble complexity and perceptual similarity on rapid averaging of hue. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[18]  B. Julesz,et al.  Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Susumu Tachi,et al.  An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Requires Visual Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[21]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional surface perception: Binocular and half-occluded scenic images , 1997, Neural Networks.

[22]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity , 1988 .

[23]  Leo Maurice Hurvich,et al.  Color vision , 1981 .

[24]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[25]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  From the Retina to the Neocortex , 1991 .

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. , 1994, Psychological review.

[27]  T. Cohn,et al.  Postural stability and stereo-ambiguity in man-designed visual environments , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[30]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[32]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  The Spatial Origin of a Perceptual Transition in Binocular Rivalry , 2008, PloS one.

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  Negligible fronto-parietal BOLD activity accompanying unreportable switches in bistable perception , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  B JULESZ,et al.  Binocular Depth Perception without Familiarity Cues , 1964, Science.

[35]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Cortical Dynamics of 3-D Surface Perception: Binocular and Half-Occluded Scenic Images , 1995 .

[36]  F Sindermann,et al.  Monocular analogues to binocular contour rivalry. , 1972, Vision research.

[37]  K. May,et al.  Perceived Direction of Motion Determined by Adaptation to Static Binocular Images , 2012, Current Biology.

[38]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[39]  Jordan W. Suchow,et al.  Motion Silences Awareness of Visual Change , 2011, Current Biology.

[40]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[41]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[42]  C. Clifford Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[43]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[44]  Sheng He,et al.  Competing Global Representations Fail to Initiate Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Neuron.

[45]  P. Atchley,et al.  Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties , 1995, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Fox,et al.  Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression , 1970 .

[47]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[48]  M. Meenes A Phenomenological Description of Retinal Rivalry , 1930 .

[49]  G. Palm,et al.  Analysis of a cooperative stereo algorithm , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[50]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.

[51]  L. Quam Hierarchical warp stereo , 1987 .

[52]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .