How scan parameter choice affects deep learning-based coronary artery disease assessment from computed tomography

[1]  K. Breininger,et al.  CAD-RADS Scoring using Deep Learning and Task-Specific Centerline Labeling , 2022, MIDL.

[2]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. , 2022, Clinical imaging.

[3]  T. Pressat-Laffouilhère,et al.  Evaluation of a deep learning model on coronary CT angiography for automatic stenosis detection. , 2022, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[4]  N. Paragios,et al.  Deep learning for lung disease segmentation on CT: Which reconstruction kernel should be used? , 2021, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging.

[5]  Gongning Luo,et al.  Transformer Network for Significant Stenosis Detection in CCTA of Coronary Arteries , 2021, MICCAI.

[6]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Prediction of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Association of Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) Using Radiomics: The Impact of the Variation of CT Scanner , 2021, Cancers.

[7]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  The Effects of In-Plane Spatial Resolution on CT-Based Radiomic Features’ Stability with and without ComBat Harmonization , 2021, Cancers.

[8]  B. Haibe-Kains,et al.  The Impact of the Variation of CT Scanner on the Prediction of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Association of Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) using Radiomic Models , 2021, medRxiv.

[9]  D. Dickerscheid,et al.  Effect of CT reconstruction settings on the performance of a deep learning based lung nodule CAD system. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Sathish Kumar Jayapal,et al.  Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019 , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Maier,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part VI , 2020, MICCAI.

[12]  Sagar B. Amin,et al.  Interobserver Reliability of the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System in Clinical Practice. , 2020, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[13]  O. Taubmann,et al.  The Technome - A Predictive Internal Calibration Approach for Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Research , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[14]  M. Mildner,et al.  Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Katharina Breininger,et al.  Deep Learning Algorithms for Coronary Artery Plaque Characterisation from CCTA Scans , 2019, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[16]  Richard D. White,et al.  Coronary Artery Classification and Weakly Supervised Abnormality Localization on Coronary CT Angiography with 3-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[17]  D. Andreini,et al.  Performance of a deep learning algorithm for the evaluation of CAD-RADS classification with CCTA. , 2019, Atherosclerosis.

[18]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Detectability of pulmonary nodules by deep learning: results from a phantom study , 2019, Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology.

[19]  Nishant Ravikumar,et al.  Coronary Artery Plaque Characterization from CCTA Scans Using Deep Learning and Radiomics , 2019, MICCAI.

[20]  Tatsuya Harada,et al.  Texture-Based Classification of Significant Stenosis in CCTA Multi-view Images of Coronary Arteries , 2019, MICCAI.

[21]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A Recurrent CNN for Automatic Detection and Classification of Coronary Artery Plaque and Stenosis in Coronary CT Angiography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  L. Schwartz,et al.  CT Slice Thickness and Convolution Kernel Affect Performance of a Radiomic Model for Predicting EGFR Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[23]  L. Qiu,et al.  A preliminary study , 2018, Medicine.

[24]  J. Canales‐Vázquez,et al.  Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters. , 2018, Radiology.

[25]  A. A. Abdel Razek,et al.  Inter-observer agreement of the Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADSTM) in patients with stable chest pain , 2018, Polish journal of radiology.

[26]  R. Cury,et al.  Coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADSTM): Inter-observer agreement for assessment categories and modifiers. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[27]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): An Expert Consensus Document of SCCT, ACR and NASCI: Endorsed by the ACC. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[28]  Bertram J Jobst,et al.  Computer-aided detection of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[29]  Yefeng Zheng,et al.  Robust and Accurate Coronary Artery Centerline Extraction in CTA by Combining Model-Driven and Data-Driven Approaches , 2013, MICCAI.

[30]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Four-Chamber Heart Modeling and Automatic Segmentation for 3-D Cardiac CT Volumes Using Marginal Space Learning and Steerable Features , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  J. Rumberger,et al.  A rosetta stone for coronary calcium risk stratification: agatston, volume, and mass scores in 11,490 individuals. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  V. Fuster,et al.  The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.