The Balance between Acetylation and Deacetylation Controls Smad7 Stability*

Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) regulates multiple cellular processes via activation of Smad signaling pathways. We have recently demonstrated that the inhibitory Smad7 interacts with the acetyl transferase p300 and that p300 acetylates Smad7 on two lysine residues. These lysine residues are critical for Smurf-mediated ubiquitination of Smad7, and acetylation protects Smad7 from TGFβ-induced degradation. In this study we demonstrate that Smad7 interacts with specific histone deacetylases (HDACs) and that the same HDACs are able to deacetylate Smad7. The interaction with HDACs is dependent on the C-terminal MH2 domain of Smad7. In addition, HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of Smad7 decreases the stability of Smad7 by enhancing its ubiquitination. Thus, our results demonstrate that the degradation of Smad7 is regulated by the balance between acetylation, deacetylation and ubiquitination, indicating that this could be a general mechanism to regulate the stability of cellular proteins.

[1]  J. Massagué,et al.  Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus , 2003, Cell.

[2]  T. Kouzarides,et al.  Regulation of E2F1 activity by acetylation , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[3]  R. Derynck,et al.  Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Ulf Hellman,et al.  Control of Smad7 stability by competition between acetylation and ubiquitination. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[5]  C. Caron,et al.  Regulatory cross‐talk between lysine acetylation and ubiquitination: role in the control of protein stability , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  B. Turner,et al.  dSIR2 and dHDAC6: two novel, inhibitor-resistant deacetylases in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2001, Experimental cell research.

[7]  D. Moazed,et al.  Heterochromatin and Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression , 2003, Science.

[8]  W. Greene,et al.  Acetylation of RelA at discrete sites regulates distinct nuclear functions of NF‐κB , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[9]  F. Frischknecht The history of biological warfare , 2003 .

[10]  J. Wrana,et al.  Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[11]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Three proteins define a class of human histone deacetylases related to yeast Hda1p. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. J. Gimeno,et al.  Vascular MADs: two novel MAD-related genes selectively inducible by flow in human vascular endothelium. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  H. Kikuchi,et al.  Chicken Histone Deacetylase-2 Controls the Amount of the IgM H-chain at the Steps of Both Transcription of Its Gene and Alternative Processing of Its Pre-mRNA in the DT40 Cell Line* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Chromosomal Region Maintenance 1 (CRM1)-dependent Nuclear Export of Smad Ubiquitin Regulatory Factor 1 (Smurf1) Is Essential for Negative Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling by Smad7* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  C. Heldin,et al.  Phosphorylation of Smad7 at Ser-249 Does Not Interfere with Its Inhibitory Role in Transforming Growth Factor-β-dependent Signaling but Affects Smad7-dependent Transcriptional Activation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Eric Verdin,et al.  Duration of Nuclear NF-κB Action Regulated by Reversible Acetylation , 2001, Science.

[17]  C. Heldin,et al.  Identification of Smad7, a TGFβ-inducible antagonist of TGF-β signalling , 1997, Nature.

[18]  Fred Asselbergs,et al.  Cloning and Functional Characterization of HDAC11, a Novel Member of the Human Histone Deacetylase Family* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  J. Wrana,et al.  The MAD-Related Protein Smad7 Associates with the TGFβ Receptor and Functions as an Antagonist of TGFβ Signaling , 1997, Cell.

[20]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Smad6 inhibits signalling by the TGF-β superfamily , 1997, Nature.

[21]  Wei Gu,et al.  Activation of p53 Sequence-Specific DNA Binding by Acetylation of the p53 C-Terminal Domain , 1997, Cell.

[22]  Wen‐Ming Yang,et al.  Transcriptional repression by YY1 is mediated by interaction with a mammalian homolog of the yeast global regulator RPD3. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  L. Guarente,et al.  Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase , 2000, Nature.

[24]  J. Ericsson,et al.  Coactivator-Dependent Acetylation Stabilizes Members of the SREBP Family of Transcription Factors , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  Ivan V. Gregoretti,et al.  Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family: functional implications of phylogenetic analysis. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Kuang-Hung Cheng,et al.  Histone Deacetylases: Unique Players in Shaping the Epigenetic Histone Code , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,et al.  MDM2–HDAC1‐mediated deacetylation of p53 is required for its degradation , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Ya-Li Yao,et al.  Regulation of Transcription Factor YY1 by Acetylation and Deacetylation , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  C. Heldin,et al.  Transforming Growth Factor β1 Induces Nuclear Export of Inhibitory Smad7* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  H. Bading,et al.  Neuronal activity‐dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HDAC4 and HDAC5 , 2003, Journal of neurochemistry.

[31]  J. Garin,et al.  Identification of Components of the Murine Histone Deacetylase 6 Complex: Link between Acetylation and Ubiquitination Signaling Pathways , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  F. Gannon Educate or communicate? | Ring out the old, ring in the new , 2003 .

[33]  Tomoki Chiba,et al.  Smurf1 Interacts with Transforming Growth Factor-β Type I Receptor through Smad7 and Induces Receptor Degradation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Xu Cao,et al.  A Nuclear Antagonistic Mechanism of Inhibitory Smads in Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  S. Schreiber,et al.  A Mammalian Histone Deacetylase Related to the Yeast Transcriptional Regulator Rpd3p , 1996, Science.

[36]  S. Jane,et al.  Site-specific Acetylation of the Fetal Globin Activator NF-E4 Prevents Its Ubiquitination and Regulates Its Interaction with the Histone Deacetylase, HDAC1* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Ettore Appella,et al.  p300/CBP‐mediated p53 acetylation is commonly induced by p53‐activating agents and inhibited by MDM2 , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[38]  D. Green,et al.  GSK3-mediated BCL-3 phosphorylation modulates its degradation and its oncogenicity. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[39]  J. Massagué,et al.  TGFβ Signaling in Growth Control, Cancer, and Heritable Disorders , 2000, Cell.

[40]  R. Bernards,et al.  A System for Stable Expression of Short Interfering RNAs in Mammalian Cells , 2002, Science.

[41]  Oliver Mühlemann,et al.  Inhibition by SR proteins of splicing of a regulated adenovirus pre-mRNA , 1996, Nature.