A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to predict risk of local recurrence (LR) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a new visualization and quantification approach using centrosome amplification (CA), a cancer cell–specific trait widely associated with aggressiveness. Experimental Design: This first-of-its-kind methodology evaluates the severity and frequency of numerical and structural CA present within DCIS and assigns a quantitative centrosomal amplification score (CAS) to each sample. Analyses were performed in a discovery cohort (DC, n = 133) and a validation cohort (VC, n = 119). Results: DCIS cases with LR exhibited significantly higher CAS than recurrence-free cases. Higher CAS was associated with a greater risk of developing LR (HR, 6.3 and 4.8 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001). CAS remained an independent predictor of relapse-free survival (HR, 7.4 and 4.5 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001) even after accounting for potentially confounding factors [grade, age, comedo necrosis, and radiotherapy (RT)]. Patient stratification using CAS (P < 0.0001) was superior to that by Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI; HR for CAS = 6.2 vs. HR for VNPI = 1.1). Among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery alone, CAS identified patients likely to benefit from adjuvant RT. Conclusions: CAS predicted 10-year LR risk for patients who underwent surgical management alone and identified patients who may be at low risk of recurrence, and for whom adjuvant RT may not be required. CAS demonstrated the highest concordance among the known prognostic models such as VNPI and clinicopathologic variables such as grade, age, and comedo necrosis.

[1]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  Prolyl-4-hydroxylase Α subunit 2 (P4HA2) expression is a predictor of poor outcome in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  J. Pereira-Leal,et al.  Centrosome amplification arises before neoplasia and increases upon p53 loss in tumorigenesis , 2018, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  Thioredoxin-interacting protein is an independent risk stratifier for breast ductal carcinoma in situ , 2018, Modern Pathology.

[4]  I. Ellis,et al.  Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2018, Modern Pathology.

[5]  Mary E. Edgerton,et al.  Multiclonal Invasion in Breast Tumors Identified by Topographic Single Cell Sequencing , 2018, Cell.

[6]  P. Rida,et al.  Prognostic value of CA20, a score based on centrosome amplification-associated genes, in breast tumors , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  S. Varambally,et al.  Amplified centrosomes and mitotic index display poor concordance between patient tumors and cultured cancer cells , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  M. Burkard,et al.  Centrosome amplification induces high grade features and is prognostic of worse outcomes in breast cancer , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[9]  J. Curtin,et al.  Current Chemotherapy and Potential New Targets in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma , 2016, Journal of clinical medicine research.

[10]  P. Rida,et al.  Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity. , 2015, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[11]  L. Esserman,et al.  Rethinking the Standard for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[12]  R. Osan,et al.  Rampant centrosome amplification underlies more aggressive disease course of triple negative breast cancers , 2015, Oncotarget.

[13]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Treatment Selection for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast Using the University of Southern California/Van Nuys (USC/VNPI) Prognostic Index , 2015, The breast journal.

[14]  D. Pellman,et al.  Causes and consequences of centrosome abnormalities in cancer , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  G. Wishart,et al.  Predictors of recurrence for ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  D G Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  P. Rida,et al.  Heading off with the herd: how cancer cells might maneuver supernumerary centrosomes for directional migration , 2013, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[18]  George W. Sledge,et al.  A Multigene Expression Assay to Predict Local Recurrence Risk for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Charles Swanton,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity: Seeing the Wood for the Trees , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  J. Chan A Clinical Overview of Centrosome Amplification in Human Cancers , 2011, International journal of biological sciences.

[21]  Edi Brogi,et al.  Nomogram for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  D. Carrasco,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in in situ and invasive breast carcinomas. , 2010, Cancer research.

[23]  Yan-ning Gao,et al.  Analysis of the cellular centrosome in fine-needle aspirations of the breast , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  E. Nigg Centrosome duplication: of rules and licenses. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[25]  K. Fukasawa,et al.  Centrosome amplification, chromosome instability and cancer development. , 2005, Cancer letters.

[26]  Roland Holland,et al.  Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  S. Lippman,et al.  Loss of aurora A/STK15/BTAK overexpression correlates with transition of in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[28]  N. Bundred,et al.  Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast‐conserving surgery , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[29]  W. Lingle,et al.  Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer , 2002, Oncogene.

[30]  F. Stivala,et al.  Amplified Centrosomes in Breast Cancer: A Potential Indicator of Tumor Aggressiveness , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  B. Fowble,et al.  Local recurrence after mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery and radiation. , 2000, Oncology.

[32]  W. Dupont,et al.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: Follow‐up after biopsy only , 1982, Cancer.