Software development for prediction of the weld bead in CMT and pulsed-MAG processes

Prediction of weld bead shapes prior to welding has been a challenge for researchers in recent years. The assurance of a weld shape with adequate penetration and dilution, good wetting angles and no undercuts leads to less repairing and reworking and thus, lower cost and time consumed. CMT is a variant of MIG/MAG welding process recently introduced in the market. Software control for bead-shape prediction helps the user to get familiar with this modern technology. In the present paper, two approaches were undertaken for software development. These were applied to CMT and pulsed-MAG welding and the results were compared. The graphical interface was built to help the user choose the welding parameters and get the representation of the weld bead profile. The two approaches used to predict the weld bead profiles are neural networks and interpolation method. The data entries for the two different methods are: welding process (CMT and MAG-pulsed), plate thickness, travel speed and wire feed speed. The output data is the complete welding profile defined by X and Y coordinates of the points on the welding profile. The neural networks were trained with different numbers of neurons, multiple layers and different networks, and welding data bases with different structures were used, in order to find the best fitting neural network. The final results for each method were checked against real profiles and it was concluded that the neural network method was more flexible and the accuracy of each methods was nearly the same.

[1]  Fakhreddine O. Karray,et al.  Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems Design, Theory, Tools and Applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[2]  K Furukawa,et al.  New CMT arc welding process – welding of steel to aluminium dissimilar metals and welding of super-thin aluminium sheets , 2006 .

[3]  Inês Pires,et al.  Reduction of fume and gas emissions using innovative gas metal arc welding variants , 2010 .

[4]  G. R. Jinu,et al.  Simulation of Weld Bead Geometry in GTA Welded Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) , 2009 .

[5]  P. Srinivasa Rao,et al.  Prediction of bead geometry in pulsed GMA welding using back propagation neural network , 2008 .

[6]  G. Lorenzin,et al.  The innovative use of low heat input in welding: experiences on ‘cladding’ and brazing using the CMT process , 2009 .

[7]  Prasad K. Yarlagadda,et al.  A study on prediction of bead height in robotic arc welding using a neural network , 2002 .

[8]  N. Murugan,et al.  Prediction and optimization of weld bead volume for the submerged arc process - Part 1 , 2000 .

[9]  Dilip Kumar Pratihar,et al.  Optimization and prediction of weldment profile in bead-on-plate welding of Al-1100 plates using electron beam , 2010 .

[10]  J.-Y. Jeng,et al.  Prediction of laser butt joint welding parameters using back propagation and learning vector quantization networks , 2000 .

[11]  G. Karsai,et al.  Artificial neural networks applied to arc welding process modeling and control , 1989, Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting,.

[12]  Surjya K. Pal,et al.  Artificial neural network modeling of weld joint strength prediction of a pulsed metal inert gas welding process using arc signals , 2008 .

[13]  N. Murugan,et al.  Development of mathematical models for prediction of weld bead geometry in cladding by flux cored arc welding , 2006 .

[14]  N. Shanmugam,et al.  A transient finite element simulation of the temperature and bead profiles of T-joint laser welds , 2010 .

[15]  D. S. Nagesh,et al.  Prediction of weld bead geometry and penetration in shielded metal-arc welding using artificial neural networks , 2002 .

[16]  I. Kim,et al.  Predicting Lap-Joint bead geometry in GMA welding process , 2008 .

[17]  N. Murugan,et al.  Prediction and optimization of weld bead volume for the submerged arc process. Part 2 , 2000 .