Optimal sensor placement in timber structures by means of a multi‐scale approach with material uncertainty

SUMMARY This paper investigates the optimal location of sensors in a timber structure when parametric uncertainty is considered in the microstructure of the material. In order to describe the proposed methodology, a timber beam is chosen for our numerical simulations. A classical sensor location methodology based on the Fisher information matrix is employed. Within a finite element framework, a homogenization-based multi-scale approach is adopted to model the constitutive response of timber, along with stochastic properties in the definition of the material. Nevertheless, by considering uncertainty in the micromechanical properties of wood, a significant computational cost is added to the solution of a large set of realizations represented by expensive multi-scale analyses. In order to tackle this high cost, we build a statistical approximation to the output of the computer model, known as a Bayesian emulator. Following this strategy, three micromechanical parameters are chosen to study their influence on the selection of different configurations of sensor placement. The optimal location of sensors is assessed with three different criteria: the Fisher matrix determinant, the modal assurance criterion error and the condition number. Furthermore, the robustness of this configuration is investigated in the presence of noise. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ping Xu,et al.  Dual-axis electron tomography: a new approach for investigating the spatial organization of wood cellulose microfibrils , 2007, Wood Science and Technology.

[2]  R. Hill A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials , 1965 .

[3]  Misato Norimoto,et al.  Cell wall thickness and tangential Young's modulus in coniferous early wood , 2000, Journal of Wood Science.

[4]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[5]  Daniel C. Kammer,et al.  Mass-weighting methods for sensor placement using sensor set expansion techniques , 2008 .

[6]  T. E. Timell Recent progress in the chemistry and topochemistry of compression wood , 1982, Wood Science and Technology.

[7]  M. Friswell,et al.  Ultrastructural mechanisms of deformation and failure in wood under tension , 2013 .

[8]  A. OHagan,et al.  Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  D. Kammer Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[10]  D. Satpathi,et al.  Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge , 1997 .

[11]  Michael L. Tinker,et al.  Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests , 2002 .

[12]  Hisham Abou-Kandil,et al.  SENSORS LOCATION FOR UPDATING PROBLEMS , 1999 .

[13]  Raúl A. Feijóo,et al.  Variational Foundations of Large Strain Multiscale Solid Constitutive Models: Kinematical Formulation , 2010 .

[14]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Mathematical modelling of the stochastic mechanical properties of wood and its extensibility at small scales , 2014 .

[15]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Multi-scale finite element model for a new material inspired by the mechanics and structure of wood cell-walls , 2012 .

[16]  Misato Norimoto,et al.  Three dimensional analysis of elastic constants of the wood cell wall. , 2000 .

[17]  J. M. Dinwoodie,et al.  Timber, its nature and behaviour , 1981 .

[18]  D. Owen,et al.  Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids , 1996 .

[19]  M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing , 1998 .

[20]  J. Mandel,et al.  Plasticité classique et viscoplasticité , 1972 .

[21]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Investigation on the extensibility of the wood cell-wall composite by an approach based on homogenisation and uncertainty analysis , 2014 .

[22]  Christian Hellmich,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a continuum micromechanics model for the elasticity of wood , 2005 .

[23]  Marco Domaneschi,et al.  Random imperfection fields to model the size effect in laboratory wood specimens , 2007 .

[24]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  Optimal sensor configuration of a typical transmission tower for the purpose of structural model updating , 2011 .

[25]  Aihui Zhou,et al.  Eigenvalues of rank-one updated matrices with some applications , 2007, Appl. Math. Lett..

[26]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  Sensor Placement for Damage Detection in Nonlinear Systems using System Augmentations , 2007 .

[27]  Seppo Andersson,et al.  A study of the nanostructure of the cell wall of the tracheids of conifer xylem by x-ray scattering , 2007 .

[28]  Seamus D. Garvey,et al.  Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing , 1994 .

[29]  J. Brändström MICRO- AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF NORWAY SPRUCE TRACHEIDS: A REVIEW , 2001 .

[30]  Ertugrul Taciroglu,et al.  Response‐only modal identification of structures using limited sensors , 2013 .

[31]  Leon Mishnaevsky,et al.  Moisture-related mechanical properties of softwood: 3D micromechanical modeling , 2009 .

[32]  Jozsef Bodig,et al.  Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites , 1982 .

[33]  Bin Ma,et al.  Optimal multiaxial sensor placement for modal identification of large structures , 2014 .

[34]  Hanne Wikberg,et al.  Studies of crystallinity of Scots pine and Norway spruce cellulose , 2004, Trees.

[35]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  An Energy Based Optimum Sensor Placement Criterion and its Application to Structural Damage Detection , 1994 .

[36]  J. Oakley Eliciting Gaussian process priors for complex computer codes , 2002 .

[37]  J.E.T. Penny,et al.  Evaluation of a Method for Automatic Selection of Measurement Locations Based on Subspace-Matching , 1996 .

[38]  Hendrik F. Hameka,et al.  Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications , 2001 .

[39]  T. Ohgama,et al.  Tangential Youngs Modulus of Coniferous Early Wood Investigated Using Cell Models , 1999 .

[40]  J. Beck,et al.  Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating , 2000 .

[41]  Charles R. Pickrel A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO MODAL PRETEST DESIGN , 1999 .

[42]  Jonathan Rougier,et al.  Probabilistic Inference for Future Climate Using an Ensemble of Climate Model Evaluations , 2007 .

[43]  Young-Jin Cha,et al.  Optimal placement of active control devices and sensors in frame structures using multi‐objective genetic algorithms , 2013 .

[44]  R. Newman Homogeneity in cellulose crystallinity between samples of Pinus radiata wood , 2004 .

[45]  M. Sipi,et al.  Distributions of tracheid cross-sectional dimensions in different parts of Norway spruce stems , 2008 .

[46]  E. A. de Souza Neto,et al.  Remarks on symmetry conditions in computational homogenisation problems , 2010 .

[47]  E. A. S. Neto,et al.  A large strain computational multi-scale model for the dissipative behaviour of wood cell-wall , 2011 .