Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection

Patterns of brain activity during deception have recently been characterized with fMRI on the multi-subject average group level. The clinical value of fMRI in lie detection will be determined by the ability to detect deception in individual subjects, rather than group averages. High-dimensional non-linear pattern classification methods applied to functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) images were used to discriminate between the spatial patterns of brain activity associated with lie and truth. In 22 participants performing a forced-choice deception task, 99% of the true and false responses were discriminated correctly. Predictive accuracy, assessed by cross-validation in participants not included in training, was 88%. The results demonstrate the potential of non-linear machine learning techniques in lie detection and other possible clinical applications of fMRI in individual subjects, and indicate that accurate clinical tests could be based on measurements of brain function with fMRI.

[1]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[2]  S C Strother,et al.  Commentary and Opinion: I. Principal Component Analysis, Variance Partitioning, and “Functional Connectivity” , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Morphological classification of brains via high-dimensional shape transformations and machine learning methods , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  Daryl Pregibon,et al.  Tree-based models , 1992 .

[8]  T. Farrow,et al.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[10]  J P Rosenfeld,et al.  A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. , 1988, The International journal of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Bechara,et al.  Emotion, Decision Making and the Orbitofrontal CortexCereb , 2000 .

[12]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[14]  R. C. Gur,et al.  Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Peter Rosenfeld,et al.  64 Event-related potentials in detection of deception , 1998 .

[16]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[18]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. George,et al.  A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. , 2004, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[22]  R. Gur,et al.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[23]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Statistical Models in S , 1991 .

[25]  David T. Lykken,et al.  Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test , 1991, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[26]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[28]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[29]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.