The effect of two different doses of aprotinin on hemostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: similar transfusion requirements and blood loss.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Various dosages of aprotinin have proven to be effective in reducing blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirements in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, despite the controversy surrounding the precise hemostatic mechanisms of this drug. The aim of our prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to assess differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements and the effect of two dosages of aprotinin on hemostatic activation. DESIGN AND METHODS Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting received high-dose aprotinin (n=28), pump-prime-only (PPO) aprotinin (n=28), or placebo (n=28). RESULTS The high-dose and the PPO groups had a significantly lower blood loss (985 mL [95%CI 845-1,102] and 1,255 mL, [95% CI 1,025-1,406], respectively) than the placebo group (1,416 mL, 95%CI 1,248-1,612]. Transfusion requirements were lower in the aprotinin-treated groups than in the patients receiving placebo (21 units and 15 units in the high and low-dose groups vs 59 units in placebo group). As far as concerns parameters of thrombin generation, the aprotinin groups showed a significant reduction of F1+2 prothrombin fragment but not of thrombin-antithrombin complexes. There were higher levels of natural anticoagulants, i.e. antithrombin, protein C and protein S, in the high-dose aprotinin group. As regards fibrinolysis parameters, D-dimer was lower in the aprotinin groups, and the levels of alpha2-antiplasmin and plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complexes were raised. In summary, both dosages of aprotinin were equally effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements. There was a lower activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis in cardiopulmonary bypass patients treated with aprotinin: the levels of natural anticoagulants were less decreased in the high-dose group. No differences in thrombotic complications were observed between aprotinin groups. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that both dosages of aprotinin are safe and effective in reducing transfusion requirements. Considering the difference in cost of using a low-dose or high-dose schedule, the former should be recommended for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

[1]  K. Hatakeyama,et al.  Fibrin-Rich and Platelet-Rich Thrombus Formation on Neointima: Recombinant Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Prevents Fibrin Formation and Neointimal Development following Repeated Balloon Injury of Rabbit Aorta , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[2]  M. Ray,et al.  Aprotinin Reduces Blood Loss after Cardiopulmonary Bypass by Direct Inhibition of Plasmin , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[3]  N. Hayashida,et al.  Effects of minimal-dose aprotinin on coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1997, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[4]  L. Reilly,et al.  A blinded trial of local recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor versus either local or systemic heparin in a vein bypass model. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Monocyte tissue factor expression, cell activation, and thrombin formation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a clinical study. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  J. Copeland,et al.  Aprotinin for primary coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial of three dose regimens. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  L. Cohn,et al.  Aprotinin in primary valve replacement and reconstruction: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  A. Sturk,et al.  Low-dose and high-dose aprotinin improve hemostasis in coronary operations. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Aprotinin Has no Effect on Platelet Activation and Adhesion during Cardiopulmonary Bypass , 1996, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  T. Shankey,et al.  Aprotinin modulation of platelet activation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass operations. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  R. E. Clark,et al.  A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  J. Fontcuberta,et al.  Aprotinin versus desmopressin for patients undergoing operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  D. Roberts,et al.  Half-dose aprotinin preserves hemostatic function in patients undergoing bypass operations. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  H. Teufelsbauer,et al.  Aprotinin does not decrease early graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting despite reducing postoperative bleeding and use of donated blood. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  A. Michelson,et al.  Aprotinin reduces cardiopulmonary bypass‐induced blood loss and inhibits fibrinolysis without influencing platelets , 1993, British journal of haematology.

[16]  R. Colman,et al.  Tissue factor is expressed on monocytes during simulated extracorporeal circulation. , 1993, Circulation research.

[17]  G. Hempelmann,et al.  Comparison of two aprotinin dosage regimens in pediatric patients having cardiac operations. Influence on platelet function and blood loss. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  M. Jochum,et al.  Hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass with different aprotinin dosages in pediatric patients having cardiac operations , 1993 .

[19]  J. Soria,et al.  Hemostasis in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Circulation: The Effect of Aprotinin (Trasylol) , 1991, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[20]  K. M. Taylor,et al.  EFFECT OF APROTININ ON NEED FOR BLOOD TRANSFUSION AFTER REPEAT OPEN-HEART SURGERY , 1987, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Fontcuberta,et al.  Platelet function during cardiopulmonary bypass not changed by two different doses of aprotinin. , 2000, Haematologica.

[22]  M. Jochum,et al.  Influence of high- and low-dose aprotinin on activation of hemostasis in open heart operations. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  K. Watterson,et al.  "Low-dose" aprotinin modifies hemostasis but not proinflammatory cytokine release. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  R. Pifarré Blood conservation with aprotinin , 1995 .

[25]  R. Sapsford,et al.  Effect of aprotinin (Trasylol) on aorta-coronary bypass graft patency. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  Robert W. Colman Hemostasis and thrombosis: Basic principles and clinical practice , 1987 .