Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues

Studies of endogenous (cue-directed) attention have traditionally assumed that such shifts must be volitional. However, recent behavioural experiments have shown that participants make automatic endogenous shifts of attention when presented with symbolic cues that are systematically associated with particular spatial directions, such as arrows and numerals, even when such cues were not behaviourally relevant. Here we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to test whether these automatic shifts of attention use the same mechanisms as volitional shifts of attention. We presented participants with non-predictive (50% valid) task-irrelevant arrow and numeral cues while measuring cue- and target-locked ERPs. Although the cues were task-irrelevant, they elicited attention-related ERP components previously found in studies that used informative and/or task-relevant cues. These findings further substantiate the dissociation between endogenous and volitional attentional control, and suggest that the same fronto-parietal networks involved in volitional shifts of attention are also involved in reflexive endogenous shifts of attention.

[1]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of numbers. , 2004 .

[2]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[3]  G. R Mangun,et al.  Shifting visual attention in space: an electrophysiological analysis using high spatial resolution mapping , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Lauri Nummenmaa,et al.  Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  Carlo Semenza,et al.  Sensory and cognitive processes of shifts of spatial attention induced by numbers: An ERP study , 2008, Cortex.

[7]  P. Halligan,et al.  The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Zilles,et al.  Nicotine Modulates Reorienting of Visuospatial Attention and Neural Activity in Human Parietal Cortex , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[9]  Jon Driver,et al.  Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  J. Tipples Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Jessica J. Green,et al.  Lateralized frontal activity elicited by attention-directing visual and auditory cues. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Sakiko Yoshikawa,et al.  Commonalities in the neural mechanisms underlying automatic attentional shifts by gaze, gestures, and symbols , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[21]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention to Arrows: Pointing to a New Direction , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. Nobre,et al.  The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic Control of Visual Attention , 2001, Psychological science.

[25]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task , 2006, Brain Research.

[26]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Neural Processes Involved in Directing Attention , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  Attentional networks , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[31]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[35]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Faster, more intense! The relation between electrophysiological reflections of attentional orienting, sensory gain control, and speed of responding , 2007, Brain Research.

[38]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Early posterior ERP components do not reflect the control of attentional shifts toward expected peripheral events. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[39]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.