A task-based approach to parametric imaging with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

In this paper, we propose a task-based approach to parametric imaging and apply the proposed method to an example problem of prostate cancer segmentation with dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE MRI). Traditionally, the time activity curve obtained from dynamic series of MR images is modeled without considering a specific task in order to obtain the kinetic parameters and to construct the parametric images. This mostly consists of estimating parameters based on minimizing the error between the model and measurement. In this paper, we develop a new method for the estimation of kinetic parameters based on the maximization of tumor segmentation performance. We use Fisher Ratio as the criterion that quantifies the image's ability to classify tumor and normal pixels. Then, the kinetic parameters are estimated with a weighted approach such that the Fisher Ratio is maximized. The calculation of the Fisher Ratio requires the prior knowledge of the confirmed regions of the tumor. Therefore, we use a training dataset to determine the optimum set of parametric images. The proposed method results in parametric images with a considerable improvement in terms of classification power between tumor and the normal regions of the prostate.

[1]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  Xin Liu,et al.  Prostate Cancer Segmentation With Simultaneous Estimation of Markov Random Field Parameters and Class , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[4]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Deyu Li,et al.  A Feature Selection Method Based on Fisher's Discriminant Ratio for Text Sentiment Classification , 2009, WISM.

[6]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Improved prostate cancer localization with spatially regularized dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  T. Stamey,et al.  The abnormal prostate: MR imaging at 1.5 T with histopathologic correlation. , 1987, Radiology.

[9]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  K. Yamada,et al.  Visualization of prostate cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with transrectal power Doppler ultrasound. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.