IT Spending and Firm Productivity: Additional Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector

The information systems (IS) "productivity paradox" is based on those studies that found little or no positive relationship between firm productivity and spending on IS. However, some earlier studies and one more recent study have found a positive relationship. Given the large amounts spent by organizations on information systems, it is important to understand the relationship between spending on IS and productivity. Beyond replicating positive results, an explanation is needed for the conflicting conclusions reached by these earlier studies. Data collected by the Bureau of the Census is analyzed to investigate the relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship between productivity and spending on IS is investigated using assumptions and models similar to both studies with positive findings and studies with negative findings. First, the overall relationship is investigated across all manufacturing industries. Next, the relationship is investigated industry by industry. The analysis finds a positive relationship between plant-level productivity and spending on IS. The relationship is also shown to vary across industries. The conflicting results from earlier studies are explained by understanding the characteristics of the data analyzed in each study. A large enough sample size is needed to find the relatively smaller effect from IS spending as compared to other input spending included in the models. Because the relationship between productivity and IS spending varies across industries, industry mix is shown to be an important data characteristic that may have influenced prior results.

[1]  J. Turner Organizational Performance, Size, and the Use of Data Processing Resources , 1983 .

[2]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[3]  T. Bresnahan Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers inFinancial Services , 1986 .

[4]  Richard H. Franke,et al.  Technological revolution and productivity decline: Computer introduction in the financial industry , 1987 .

[5]  M. Baily,et al.  The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power , 1989 .

[6]  S. E. Harris,et al.  Predicting organizational performance using information technology managerial control ratios , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track.

[7]  P. Alpar,et al.  A comparison of approaches to the measurement of IT value , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  P. Strassmann The business value of computers , 1990 .

[9]  T. Noyelle Skills, Wages, and Productivity in the Service Sector , 1991 .

[10]  Sidney E. Harris,et al.  Firm Size and the Information Technology Investment Intensity of LIfe Insurers , 1991, MIS Q..

[11]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Paul Alpar Automation of banking functions and its managerial implications , 1992 .

[13]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants , 1992 .

[14]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[15]  C. Gotlieb,et al.  Productivity and computers in Canadian banking , 1993 .

[16]  P. Daniels,et al.  Service Industries in the World Economy , 1993 .

[17]  Lee Ridgway,et al.  Is Information Systems Spending Productive? , 1995, SIGU.

[18]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  The trouble with computers , 1995 .

[19]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Douglas W. Dwyer Whittling Away At Productivity Dispersion , 1995 .

[21]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Contribution of Information Technology to Consumer Welfare , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[23]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[24]  Kenneth R. Troske,et al.  Workers, Wages, and Technology , 1997 .

[25]  Z. Griliches Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint , 1998 .