Effect of double constraints on the optimization of two-component armor systems

Abstract In literature, by using Florence’s model [Florence AL. Interaction of projectiles and composite armours part II. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park (CA, USA), AMMRG-CR-69-15, August 1969], the optimization of plate thicknesses can be achieved for two-component armor systems by maximizing the projectile impact velocity under the constraint of the total thickness or the areal density of the armor. In this study, the design optimization of two-component armor system is viewed from a new perspective in which both the total thickness and the areal density become the constraints. The possible solutions of this problem are systematically studied, and the effect of applying both constraints on the optimal plate thicknesses and ballistic performance is discussed. The optimal solutions are obtained by numerical computation for ceramic/aluminum and ceramic/steel armor systems under the normal impact of NATO AP 7.62 rounds. Based on the results, it is concluded that depending upon the constraint conditions, the double-constraint optimization problem can be simplified to solving either one of the single-constraint problems or directly finding the intersection points between the two constraint boundaries.

[1]  Hazim Ali Al-Qureshi,et al.  Analysis and investigation of ballistic impact on ceramic/metal composite armour , 2004 .

[2]  V. Sánchez-Gálvez,et al.  A new analytical model to simulate impact onto ceramic/composite armors , 1998 .

[3]  J. Stewart.  Multivariable calculus : concepts and contexts , 2010 .

[4]  J. G. Hetherington,et al.  Characterisation of ceramic/steel and ceramic/aluminium armours subjected to oblique impact , 1997 .

[5]  John W. Gillespie,et al.  Finite element analysis of tile-reinforced composite structural armor subjected to bending loads , 2004 .

[6]  Gao Qing Lu,et al.  On the optimisation of two-component plates against ballistic impact , 1996 .

[7]  G Davila Carlos,et al.  Advanced Modeling Strategies for the Analysis of Tile-Reinforced Composite Armor , 1999 .

[8]  J. G. Hetherington,et al.  The optimization of two component composite armours , 1992 .

[9]  C. Navarro,et al.  Numerical modeling of the impact behavior of new particulate-loaded composite materials , 2003 .

[10]  Y. Gupta,et al.  Load spreading and penetration resistance of layered structures—a numerical study , 2004 .

[11]  J. G. Hetherington,et al.  An investigation into the energy absorbed during ballistic perforation of composite armours , 1991 .

[12]  B. K. Fink,et al.  Aluminum foam integral armor: a new dimension in armor design , 2001 .

[13]  Xiaogang Huang,et al.  Mechanics of integral armor: discontinuous ceramic-cored sandwich structure under tension and shear , 1996 .

[14]  Dov Sherman,et al.  Impact failure mechanisms in alumina tiles on finite thickness support and the effect of confinement , 2000 .

[15]  R. Mines,et al.  A one-dimensional stress wave analysis of a lightweight composite armour , 2004 .

[16]  J. G. Hetherington,et al.  The effect of obliquity on the ballistic performance of two component composite armours , 1994 .

[17]  Gabi Ben-Dor,et al.  Optimization of two-component composite armor against ballistic impact , 2005 .