Do Eye Movements During Shape Discrimination Reveal an Underlying Geometric Structure

Using a psychophysical approach coupled with eye-tracking measures, we varied length and width of shape stimuli to determine the objective parameters that corresponded to subjective determination of square/rectangle judgments. Participants viewed a two-dimensional shape stimulus and made a two-alternative forced-choice whether it was a square or rectangle. Participants’ gaze was tracked throughout the task to explore directed visual attention to the vertical and horizontal axes of space. Behavioral results provide threshold values for two-dimensional square/rectangle perception, and eye-tracking data indicated that participants directed attention to the major and minor principal axes. Results are consistent with the use of the major and minor principal axis of space for shape perception and may have theoretical and empirical implications for orientation via geometric cues.

[1]  J. Henderson.  Gaze Control as Prediction , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Reorienting in Virtual 3D Environments: Do Adult Humans Use Principal Axes, Medial Axes or Local Geometry? , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  W. Walthen-Dunn.  A Transformation for Extracting New De scriptors of Shape ' , in , 2017 .

[6]  Bradley R. Sturz,et al.  On Discriminating between Geometric Strategies of Surface-Based Orientation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[7]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Geometry, features and orientation in vertebrate animals : a pictorial review , 2006 .

[8]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  T. Gurley,et al.  Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  Ken Cheng,et al.  How to navigate without maps: The power of taxon-like navigation in ants , 2012 .

[11]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[12]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[13]  Bradley R. Sturz,et al.  Neither by global nor local cues alone: evidence for a unified orientation process , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[14]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[15]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[18]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  A misunderstanding of principal and medial axes? Reply to Sturz & Bodily , 2011, Biology Letters.

[19]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Reflections on geometry and navigation , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[22]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[23]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[24]  J. Henderson,et al.  Classifying mental states from eye movements during scene viewing. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Jennifer E. Sutton,et al.  What is geometric information and how do animals use it? , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[26]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[27]  K. Bodily,et al.  Is surface-based orientation influenced by a proportional relationship of shape parameters? , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Re-orienting in space: do animals use global or local geometry strategies? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[29]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task , 2012, Cognition.

[30]  Manish Singh,et al.  Bayesian estimation of the shape skeleton , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  B. Scholl,et al.  “Please Tap the Shape, Anywhere You Like” , 2014, Psychological science.

[32]  B. Sturz.  Of global space or perceived place ? , 2022 .

[33]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Face scanning in chimpanzees and humans: continuity and discontinuity , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Spontaneous Reorientation Is Guided by Perceived Surface Distance, Not by Image Matching Or Comparison , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[36]  Kent D. Bodily,et al.  Does constraining field of view prevent extraction of geometric cues for humans during virtual-environment reorientation? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[37]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[38]  Noam Miller,et al.  Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[39]  K. Bodily,et al.  Of global space or perceived place? Comment on Kelly et al. , 2011, Biology Letters.

[40]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.

[41]  Stephane Durocher,et al.  Comparing geometric models for orientation: Medial vs. principal axes , 2011, Communicative & integrative biology.

[42]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[43]  Debbie M Kelly,et al.  Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Katherine A. Gaskin,et al.  Incidental encoding of enclosure geometry does not require visual input: evidence from blindfolded adults , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Paul Graham,et al.  View-based matching can be more than image matching: The importance of considering an animal's perspective , 2012, i-Perception.