Indoor productivity measured by common response patterns to physical and psychosocial stimuli.

Productivity is the essential organizational outcome. It is vaguely understood and difficult to quantify, especially at the individual level in office companies. Our objective was to quantify and describe the part of productivity, which is systematically influenced by the indoor environment. We, therefore, introduce the concept 'indoor productivity,' which is defined by measuring operations. We used the multivariate method Marker Object Projection to transform questionnaire data into an 'indoor productivity index' (IPI), which reflects the relative impact of the variables that systematically influence indoor productivity. The reasoning behind IPI is that indoor productivity cannot be separated from experienced indoor environment and wellness at work. IPI is calculated for each respondent based on own, colleagues', and two fictive respondents' answers. Conservatively, IPI was calculated to constitute about 25% of what determines the productivity of an individual. By using IPI as dependent variable in multiple regression analyses, the relative contribution of all indoor variables was identified. Physical indoor variables were as important as psychosocial ones. During the cold seasons, 'dry air' was the most important factor reducing IPI.

[1]  W. Fisk.  HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY GAINS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[2]  K Reijula,et al.  Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: a questionnaire as a means of problem diagnosis , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[3]  Palmer Morrel-Samuels.  Getting the truth into workplace surveys. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[4]  John Steel,et al.  Influenza Virus Transmission Is Dependent on Relative Humidity and Temperature , 2007, PLoS pathogens.

[5]  A. Madsen,et al.  Exposure to Dust and Endotoxin of Employees in Cucumber and Tomato Nurseries , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  P O Fanger,et al.  Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance. , 2004, Indoor air.

[7]  T. Sterling,et al.  Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments. , 1986, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  R Akselsson,et al.  Effect of air humidification on the sick building syndrome and perceived indoor air quality in hospitals: a four month longitudinal study. , 1994, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[9]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  The performance and subjective responses of call-center operators with new and used supply air filters at two outdoor air supply rates. , 2004, Indoor air.

[10]  D Norbäck,et al.  Personal and psychosocial factors and symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome in the Swedish workforce. , 2006, Indoor air.

[11]  G. Clausen,et al.  The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. , 2004, Indoor air.

[12]  Derek Clements-Croome,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INDOOR ENVIRONMENT , 2000 .

[13]  Motoji Takahashi,et al.  Effect of exposure of human skin to a dry environment , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[14]  D P Wyon,et al.  The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity. , 2004, Indoor air.

[15]  P. M. Bluyssen,et al.  Relations between perceived indoor environment characteristics and well-being of occupants at individual level , 2006 .

[16]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  Improving indoor air quality improves the performance of office work and schoolwork , 2007 .

[17]  Effect of room humidity on the formation of fine wrinkles in the facial skin of Japanese , 2007, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[18]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  The dichotomy of relative humidity on indoor air quality. , 2007, Environment international.

[19]  D. Galler,et al.  Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of the airway mucosa. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[20]  Erkki Kähkönen,et al.  Psychosocial dimensions of solving an indoor air problem. , 2002, Indoor air.

[21]  Geo Clausen,et al.  Objective and Subjective Responses to Low Relative Humidity in an Office Intervention Study , 2003 .

[22]  Olav M. Kvalheim,et al.  Latent-structure decompositions (projections) of multivariate data , 1987 .

[23]  Judith A. Cumby,et al.  Non‐financial performance measures in the Canadian biotechnology industry , 2001 .

[24]  T. Judge,et al.  The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  Experimental Determination of the Limiting Criteria for Human Exposure to Low Winter Humidity Indoors (RP-1160) , 2006 .

[26]  Vinesh G. Oommen,et al.  Should Health Service Managers Embrace Open Plan Work Environments?: A Review , 2008 .