The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience
暂无分享,去创建一个
reasoning, it should come as no surprise if we have innate responses to personal violence that are powerful but rather primitive. That is, we might expect humans to have negative emotional responses to certain basic forms of interpersonal violence. ... In contrast, when a harm is impersonal, it should fail to trigger this alarmlike emotional response, allowing people to respond in a more "cognitive" way, perhaps employing a cost-benefit analysis.60 Similarly, Singer writes, For most of our evolutionary history, human beings have lived in
[1] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.
[2] Joshua D. Greene. The secret joke of Kant's soul. , 2008 .
[3] Andrew D. Engell,et al. The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.
[4] Joshua D. Greene. From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.