Evaluation of the performance of a motion capture system for small displacement recording and a discussion for its application potential in bone deformation in vivo measurements

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a motion capture system and discuss the application potential of the proposed system in in vivo bone-segment deformation measurements. In this study, the effects of the calibration procedure, camera distance and marker size on the accuracy and precision of the motion capture system have been investigated by comparing the captured movement of the markers with reference movement. The results indicated that the system resolution is at least 20 µm in a capture volume of 400  ×  300  ×  300 mm3, which mostly covers the range of motion of the tibia during the stance phase of one gait cycle. Within this volume, the system accuracy and precision decreased following the increase of camera distance along the optical axis of the cameras. With the best configuration, the absolute error and precision for the range of 20 µm displacement were 1.2–1.8 µm and 1.5–2.5 µm, respectively. Small markers (Ø3–8 mm) yielded better accuracy and repeatability than the larger marker (Ø10.5 mm). We conclude that the proposed system is capable of recording minor displacements in a relative large volume.

[1]  C. Turner,et al.  Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. , 1995, Bone.

[2]  D B Burr,et al.  In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. , 1996, Bone.

[3]  C. Milgrom,et al.  A Home Exercise Program for Tibial Bone Strengthening Based on In Vivo Strain Measurements , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  L. Maletsky,et al.  Accuracy of an optical active-marker system to track the relative motion of rigid bodies. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  L. Felländer-Tsai,et al.  The reliability and validity of an instrumented staple system for in vivo measurement of local bone deformation , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[6]  S. Evans,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of an optical motion analysis system for measuring small deformations of biological tissues. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  I. Owan,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  G. Brüggemann,et al.  What do we currently know from in vivo bone strain measurements in humans? , 2011, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[9]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Do high impact exercises produce higher tibial strains than running? , 2000, British journal of sports medicine.

[10]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[11]  G. Németh,et al.  Methodological concerns using intra-cortical pins to measure tibiofemoral kinematics , 2003, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  J Matsuyama,et al.  A new method for measurement of bone deformation by echo tracking. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Devin R. Berg,et al.  Precision, repeatability and accuracy of Optotrak® optical motion tracking systems , 2009 .

[14]  B. Nigg,et al.  Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system , 1995 .

[15]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  D. Ramsey,et al.  Biomechanics of the knee: methodological considerations in the in vivo kinematic analysis of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  C. Turner,et al.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[18]  J B Brunski,et al.  Microstrain fields for cortical bone in uniaxial tension: Optical analysis method , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  A. Pitsillides,et al.  Using digital image correlation to determine bone surface strains during loading and after adaptation of the mouse tibia. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Markus Windolf,et al.  Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. , 1998, Bone.

[22]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Measurement of Strain Distributions in Mouse Femora with 3D-Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry. , 2007, Optics and lasers in engineering.

[23]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Using Bone's Adaptation Ability to Lower the Incidence of Stress Fractures , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  B. Bay,et al.  Comparison of the linear finite element prediction of deformation and strain of human cancellous bone to 3D digital volume correlation measurements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  R. Major Biomechanics of the Musculo-Skeletal System , 1994 .

[26]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Margareta Nordin,et al.  Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal Systm , 1989 .

[28]  C Milgrom,et al.  A comparison of bone strain measurements at anatomically relevant sites using surface gauges versus strain gauged bone staples. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.