Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the structure and the defeasibility conditions of argument from analogy, addressing the issues of determining the nature of the comparison underlying the analogy and the types of inferences justifying the conclusion. In the dialectical tradition, different forms of similarity were distinguished and related to the possible inferences that can be drawn from them. The kinds of similarity can be divided into four categories, depending on whether they represent fundamental semantic features of the terms of the comparison (essential similarities) or non-semantic ones, indicating possible characteristics of the referents (accidental similarities). Such distinct types of similarity characterize different kinds of analogical arguments, all based on a similar general structure, in which a common genus (or rather a generic feature) is abstracted. Depending on the nature of the abstracted common feature, different rules of inference will apply, guaranteeing the attribution of the analogical predicate to the genus and to the primary subject. This analysis of similarity and the relationship thereof with the rules of inference allows a deeper investigation of the defeasibility conditions.

[1]  D. Walton,et al.  Emotive Language in Argumentation , 2014 .

[2]  Cameron Shelley,et al.  Multiple Analogies in Science and Philosophy , 2003 .

[3]  Aristotle.  The Complete Works Of Aristotle , 1954 .

[4]  FABRIZIO MACAGNO,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Semantic Rules of Inference , 2014, Revue internationale de philosophie.

[5]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity. , 1990 .

[6]  W. D. Pater.  Les topiques d'Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne : la méthodologie de la définition , 1965 .

[7]  D. Boethius,et al.  Boethius's "De topicis differentiis" , 1978 .

[8]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The Structure of Analogical Models in Science. , 1980 .

[9]  Lloyd L. Weinreb.  Legal Reason: Frontmatter , 2005 .

[10]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argumentation Schemes for Argument from Analogy , 2014 .

[11]  D. Walton,et al.  Classification and Ambiguity: The Role of Definition in a Conceptual System , 2011 .

[12]  M. Beuchot,et al.  The Tradition of the Topics in the Middles Ages: The Commentaries on Aristotle's and Boethius' Topics. , 1987 .

[13]  Matthew S. Wood.  Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor Revisited , 2017 .

[14]  Todd R. Davies,et al.  Determination, Uniformity, and Relevance: Normative Criteria for Generalization and Reasoning by Analogy , 1988 .

[15]  Modera revivals of Aristotle's and Cicero's Topics: Toulmin, Perelman, Anscombre/Ducrot , 2001 .

[16]  Iovan Drehe.  The Aristotelian Dialectical Topos , 2011 .

[17]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Introduction To Logic , 1958 .

[18]  D. Walton,et al.  Emotive Language in Argumentation: Contents , 2014 .

[19]  D. Walton,et al.  Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories , 2009, Philosophy & Rhetoric.

[20]  R. Posner.  Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument , 2006 .

[21]  Susan Craw,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[22]  Fabrizio Macagno.  Analogy and Redefinition , 2014 .

[23]  Aristotle,et al.  Generation of animals , 1942 .

[24]  Fabrizio Macagno,et al.  The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises: Presumptions in Enthymemes , 2013 .

[25]  M. Guarini,et al.  Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide , 2009 .

[26]  Makoto Haraguchi,et al.  A Goal-Dependent Abstraction for Legal Reasoning by Analogy , 1997, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[27]  A. C. Lloyd.  Genus, species and ordered series in Aristotle , 1962 .

[28]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Law, learning and representation , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[29]  Irving M. Copi,et al.  Introduction to Logic , 1962 .

[30]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[31]  Manfred Kienpointner,et al.  On the Art of Finding Arguments: What Ancient and Modern Masters of Invention Have to Tell Us About the "Ars Inveniendi" , 1997 .

[32]  Geoffrey Lloyd,et al.  Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought , 1987 .

[33]  Marko Malink,et al.  Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic , 2013 .

[34]  Norman Kretzmann,et al.  Topics: their development and absorption into consequences , 1982 .

[35]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argumentative Reasoning Patterns , 2006 .

[36]  Eddo Rigotti,et al.  Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage , 2007 .

[37]  André Juthe.  Argument by Analogy , 2005 .

[38]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy , 2010, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[39]  G. Phillips.  The Generation of Animals , 1963, The Classical Review.

[40]  Two Traditions of Analogy , 1989 .

[41]  Francis P. Dinneen.  Peter of Spain: Language in Dispute. An English translation of Peter of Spain's 'Tractatus' called afterwards SUMMULAE LOGICALES, based on the critical edition by L.M. de Rijk , 1990 .

[42]  Paul Bartha,et al.  By parallel reasoning : the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments , 2010 .

[43]  The topics in medieval logic , 1987 .

[44]  H. J. Ribeiro,et al.  Systematic approaches to argument by analogy , 2014 .

[45]  Sheldon M. Cohen.  Dialectic and Its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic , 1992 .

[46]  Otto Bird.  The formalizing of the topics in mediaeval logic , 1960, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[47]  Mary Hesse.  Akistotle’s Logic of Analogy , 1965 .

[48]  B. Waller.  Classifying and Analyzing Analogies , 2001 .

[49]  Marguerite Deslauriers,et al.  Aristotle on Definition , 2007 .

[50]  Joke Meheus,et al.  Analogical Reasoning in Creative Problem Solving Processes: Logico-Philosophical Perspectives , 2000 .

[51]  Mary Hesse,et al.  THEORIES, FAMILY RESEMBLANCES AND ANALOGY , 1988 .

[52]  Sara Rubinelli,et al.  Ars Topica, The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero , 2009, Argumentation Library.

[53]  Lloyd L. Weinreb.  Legal Reason: Index , 2005 .

[54]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Metaphors and Models , 1980, AAAI.

[55]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Analogy by Similarity , 1988 .

[56]  Louise Cummings.  Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty , 2015 .

[57]  Otto Bird.  The Tradition of the Logical Topics: Aristotle to Ockham , 1962 .

[58]  Paul Slomkowski,et al.  Aristotle's Topics , 1997 .

[59]  Lindley Darden,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction , 1982, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[60]  Mary Hesse,et al.  Models and analogies in science , 1970 .