Differential Geometric Analysis of Alterations in MH α-Helices

Antigen presenting cells present processed peptides via their major histocompatibility (MH) complex to the T cell receptors (TRs) of T cells. If a peptide is immunogenic, a signaling cascade can be triggered within the T cell. However, the binding of different peptides and/or different TRs to MH is also known to influence the spatial arrangement of the MH α‐helices which could itself be an additional level of T cell regulation. In this study, we introduce a new methodology based on differential geometric parameters to describe MH deformations in a detailed and comparable way. For this purpose, we represent MH α‐helices by curves. On the basis of these curves, we calculate in a first step the curvature and torsion to describe each α‐helix independently. In a second step, we calculate the distribution parameter and the conical curvature of the ruled surface to describe the relative orientation of the two α‐helices. On the basis of four different test sets, we show how these differential geometric parameters can be used to describe changes in the spatial arrangement of the MH α‐helices for different biological challenges. In the first test set, we illustrate on the basis of all available crystal structures for (TR)/pMH complexes how the binding of TRs influences the MH helices. In the second test set, we show a cross evaluation of different MH alleles with the same peptide and the same MH allele with different peptides. In the third test set, we present the spatial effects of different TRs on the same peptide/MH complex. In the fourth test set, we illustrate how a severe conformational change in an α‐helix can be described quantitatively. Taken together, we provide a novel structural methodology to numerically describe subtle and severe alterations in MH α‐helices for a broad range of applications. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  U. Omasits,et al.  A Comparative Approach Linking Molecular Dynamics of Altered Peptide Ligands and MHC with In Vivo Immune Responses , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Manju Bansal,et al.  Small local variations in B-form DNA lead to a large variety of global geometries which can accommodate most DNA-binding protein motifs , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[3]  Taehyo Kim,et al.  Minimal surface as a model of β‐sheets , 2005 .

[4]  P. A. van der Merwe,et al.  Molecular mechanisms involved in T cell receptor triggering. , 2007, Seminars in immunology.

[5]  A Goriely,et al.  Continuous representations of proteins: construction of coordinate models from curvature profiles. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  L. Stern,et al.  Probing the ligand-induced conformational change in HLA-DR1 by selective chemical modification and mass spectrometric mapping. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[7]  J. Holoshitz,et al.  MHC molecules in health and disease: At the cusp of a paradigm shift. , 2011, Self/nonself.

[8]  Elfi Kraka,et al.  !"#c%&'(&)* ,*-."c)/*&(&)* )0 ."/12,% ,*-!&#()%("- 3"c)*-,%4 3(%1c(1%"# &* 5%)("&*# 6#&*/ (h" 81()9,("-5%)("&* 3(%1c(1%" 8*,24#&# :"(h)- 1= Introduction , 2022 .

[9]  Taehyo Kim,et al.  Mean curvature as a major determinant of ß-sheet propensity , 2006, Bioinform..

[10]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[11]  C. Pontzer,et al.  Both alpha-helices along the major histocompatibility complex binding cleft are required for staphylococcal enterotoxin A function. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Gunter Schneider,et al.  Determination of Structural Principles Underlying Three Different Modes of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Escape from CTL Recognition1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  B Murphy,et al.  Indirect allorecognition of major histocompatibility complex allopeptides in human renal transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction. , 1997, Transplantation.

[14]  A. Pandini,et al.  Detection of allosteric signal transmission by information-theoretic analysis of protein dynamics , 2012, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  David M. Kranz,et al.  Solution mapping of T cell receptor docking footprints on peptide-MHC , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Docarmo Differential geometry of curves and surfaces , 1976 .

[17]  Brian M. Baker,et al.  Conformational changes and flexibility in T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC complexes , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  B. Ksander,et al.  The absence of invariant chain in MHC II cancer vaccines enhances the activation of tumor-reactive type 1 CD4+ T lymphocytes , 2008, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[19]  M R Jackson,et al.  The crystal structures of K(bm1) and K(bm8) reveal that subtle changes in the peptide environment impact thermostability and alloreactivity. , 2001, Immunity.

[20]  E. Adams,et al.  The adaptable major histocompatibility complex (MHC) fold: structure and function of nonclassical and MHC class I-like molecules. , 2013, Annual review of immunology.

[21]  J. Quine,et al.  Helix parameters and protein structure using quaternions , 1999 .

[22]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  K. Wood,et al.  Indirect presentation of MHC antigens in transplantation. , 1994, Immunology today.

[24]  H. Piaggio Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 1952, Nature.

[25]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[26]  Ranbir Singh,et al.  J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) , 1996 .

[27]  Marie-Paule Lefranc,et al.  IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/DomainGapAlign: a database and a tool for immunoglobulins or antibodies, T cell receptors, MHC, IgSF and MhcSF , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  A. S. Wiener,et al.  Transplantation , 1963 .

[29]  Richard Bertram,et al.  Mathematical aspects of protein structure determination with NMR orientational restraints , 2004, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[30]  Philippa Marrack,et al.  Crossreactive T Cells spotlight the germline rules for alphabeta T cell-receptor interactions with MHC molecules. , 2008, Immunity.

[31]  B. Maillère,et al.  3-Layer-based analysis of peptide-MHC interaction: in silico prediction, peptide binding affinity and T cell activation in a relevant allergen-specific model. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[32]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Flexibility of the MHC class II peptide binding cleft in the bound, partially filled, and empty states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2009, Biopolymers.

[33]  Alain Roussel,et al.  Distinct orientation of the alloreactive monoclonal CD8 T cell activation program by three different peptide/MHC complexes , 2006, European journal of immunology.

[34]  Gerard C. L. Wong,et al.  Arginine in α-Defensins , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[36]  Jon Cohen,et al.  Superantigens: microbial agents that corrupt immunity. , 2002, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[37]  J. Fangmann,et al.  T cell recognition of donor major histocompatibility complex class Ipeptides during allograft rejection , 1992, European journal of immunology.

[38]  Philippa Marrack,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved amino acids that control TCR-MHC interaction. , 2008, Annual review of immunology.

[39]  Ettore Appella,et al.  Single MHC mutation eliminates enthalpy associated with T cell receptor binding. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Helmut Pottmann,et al.  On the computational geometry of ruled surfaces , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[41]  H. Pottmann,et al.  Approximation by ruled surfaces , 1999 .

[42]  Machteld Oudshoorn,et al.  Allogeneic MHC class I molecules with numerous sequence differences do not elicit a CTL response. , 2005, Human immunology.

[43]  Ronald N. Germain,et al.  MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation: Providing ligands for T lymphocyte activation , 1994, Cell.

[44]  Brian B. Goldman,et al.  QSD quadratic shape descriptors. 2. Molecular docking using quadratic shape descriptors (QSDock) , 2000, Proteins.

[45]  C S Cardoso,et al.  HFE, the MHC and hemochromatosis: paradigm for an extended function for MHC class I. , 2003, Tissue antigens.

[46]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[47]  J. Whisstock,et al.  A Structural Basis for the Selection of Dominant αβ T Cell Receptors in Antiviral Immunity , 2003 .

[48]  Don C. Wiley,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of a human class II histocompatibility molecule complexed with superantigen , 1994, Nature.

[49]  Bernhard Knapp,et al.  MH2c: Characterization of major histocompatibility α-helices – an information criterion approach☆ , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[50]  Alessandro Pandini,et al.  Structural alphabets derived from attractors in conformational space , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[51]  L. Wilkinson Immunity , 1891, The Lancet.

[52]  J. McCluskey,et al.  The Structure of HLA-B8 Complexed to an Immunodominant Viral Determinant: Peptide-Induced Conformational Changes and a Mode of MHC Class I Dimerization1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[53]  Shula Shazman,et al.  From face to interface recognition: a differential geometric approach to distinguish DNA from RNA binding surfaces , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  R. Wilcox Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 1997 .

[55]  Quentin Kaas,et al.  IG, TR and IgSF, MHC and MhcSF: what do we learn from the IMGT Colliers de Perles? , 2008, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[56]  Shan Zhao,et al.  Minimal molecular surfaces and their applications , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  C. Story,et al.  New functions of the MHC class I-related Fc receptor, FcRn. , 1997, Biochemical Society transactions.

[58]  L. Stern,et al.  Conformational variation in structures of classical and non‐classical MHCII proteins and functional implications , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[59]  Robyn L Stanfield,et al.  How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[60]  C. Dulac,et al.  Functional Expression of Murine V2R Pheromone Receptors Involves Selective Association with the M10 and M1 Families of MHC Class Ib Molecules , 2003, Cell.

[61]  K. Pearson,et al.  Biometrika , 1902, The American Naturalist.

[62]  Ian A Wilson,et al.  The specificity of TCR/pMHC interaction. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[63]  Bernhard Knapp,et al.  Association of HLA-DR1 with the allergic response to the major mugwort pollen allergen: molecular background , 2012, BMC Immunology.

[64]  Thomas Lewiner,et al.  Curvature and torsion estimators based on parametric curve fitting , 2005, Comput. Graph..

[65]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[66]  D. DeLuca,et al.  HistoCheck: rating of HLA class I and II mismatches by an internet-based software tool , 2004, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[67]  L Davies,et al.  Bone marrow transplant. , 1985, Nursing times.