Decadal Polar Motion of the Earth Excited by the Convective Outer Core From Geodynamo Simulations

Long time geodetic observation records show that the orientation of the Earth's rotation axis with respect to the terrestrial reference frame, or polar motion, changes on a broad range of timescales. Apart from external torques from the luni‐solar tides, these changes are excited by interactions among different components of the Earth system. The convective fluid outer core has long been conjectured a likely contributor to the observed polar motion on timescales upward of decades, such as the ∼30 year Markowitz wobble. We investigated the electromagnetic coupling scenario across the core‐mantle boundary via numerical geodynamo simulation for different geodynamo parameters (Rayleigh numbers and magnetic Rossby numbers). Our simulated polar motion varies strongly with the dynamo parameters, while its excitation on decadal timescales appear to converge asymptotically within the adopted range of numerical Rossby numbers. Three strongest asymptotic modes emerge from numerical results, with periods around 30, 40, and 60 years for the prograde excitation and around 24, 30, and 60 years for the retrograde excitation. Their amplitudes are all larger than 5 × 10−8, or approximately 10 milliseconds of arc. The results suggest that the electromagnetic core‐mantle coupling could explain a substantial portion, if not all, of the observed decadal polar motion. In particular, the predicted 60 year polar motion deserves special attention for future observations and studies.

[1]  B. Chao Dynamics of axial torsional libration under the mantle‐inner core gravitational interaction , 2017 .

[2]  T. Dam,et al.  A comparison of interannual hydrological polar motion excitation from GRACE and geodetic observations , 2016 .

[3]  E. Ivins,et al.  Climate-driven polar motion: 2003–2015 , 2016, Science Advances.

[4]  N. Olsen,et al.  CM5, a Pre-Swarm Comprehensive Geomagnetic Field Model Derived from Over 12 Yr of CHAMP, Orsted, SAC-C and Observatory Data , 2015 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Lemoine,et al.  Interannual variations in degree‐2 Earth's gravity coefficients C2,0, C2,2, and S2,2 reveal large‐scale mass transfers of climatic origin , 2013 .

[6]  O. de Viron,et al.  Characterization and implications of intradecadal variations in length of day , 2013, Nature.

[7]  John C. Ries,et al.  Rapid ice melting drives Earth's pole to the east , 2013 .

[8]  M. Schindelegger,et al.  Recent estimates of Earth‐atmosphere interaction torques and their use in studying polar motion variability , 2013 .

[9]  B. Steinberger,et al.  Absolute plate motions in a reference frame defined by moving hot spots in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans , 2012 .

[10]  J. Wahr,et al.  Ice Age Earth Rotation , 2011 .

[11]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models , 2010 .

[12]  Kathy Whaler,et al.  Biased residuals of core flow models from satellite-derived 'virtual observatories' , 2009 .

[13]  Weijia Kuang,et al.  An MPI-based MoSST core dynamics model , 2008 .

[14]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Rapidly changing flows in the Earth's core , 2008 .

[15]  M. Dumberry Gravitational torque on the inner core and decadal polar motion , 2008 .

[16]  H. Schuh,et al.  Effects of inter-annual water storage variations on polar motion , 2007 .

[17]  B. Buffett,et al.  Detection of a gravitational oscillation in length-of-day , 2006 .

[18]  J. Mound Electromagnetic torques in the core and resonant excitation of decadal polar motion , 2005 .

[19]  C. Wilson,et al.  On long-period polar motion , 2002 .

[20]  H. Schuh,et al.  Linear drift and periodic variations observed in long time series of polar motion , 2001 .

[21]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Magnetohydrodynamic Convection in a Rapidly Rotating Spherical Shell , 1999 .

[22]  F. Bryan,et al.  Climate‐driven polar motion , 1999 .

[23]  D. Stammer,et al.  Oceanic signals in observed motions of the Earth's pole of rotation , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  An Earth-like numerical dynamo model , 1997, Nature.

[25]  B. Buffett Gravitational oscillations in the length of day , 1996 .

[26]  D. Dong,et al.  Topographic core-mantle coupling and polar motion on decadal time-scales , 1996 .

[27]  M. Greff-Lefftz,et al.  Core-mantle coupling and polar motion , 1995 .

[28]  B. Chao Excitation of Earth’s polar motion by atmospheric angular momentum variations, 1980–1990 , 1993 .

[29]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Fluid flow near the surface of Earth's outer core , 1991 .

[30]  David Engel The Rotation Of The Earth A Geophysical Discussion , 1961, Geological Magazine.

[31]  Richard S. Gross,et al.  Earth Rotation Variations – Long Period , 2007 .

[32]  G. Wilkins,et al.  The earth's rotation and reference frames for geodesy and geodynamics : proceedings of the 128th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union, held in Coolfont, West Virginia, U.S.A., 20-24 October 1986 , 1988 .

[33]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  The Earth’s Variable Rotation: Some Geophysical Causes , 1988 .

[34]  W. Markowitz Concurrent Astronomical Observations for Studying Continental Drift, Polar Motion, and the Rotation of the Earth , 1968 .