Targeting Conservation Action through Assessment of Protection and Exurban Threats

Abstract:  Landscape‐level assessments of biodiversity strive to guide land‐use planning and conservation activities by providing information about areas of high biodiversity value and low protection status. I developed a methodology to assess the level of threat to conservation of biodiversity to help guide conservation action. This method incorporates socioeconomic indicators of risk, including developed and roaded areas, and measures the proportion of conservation lands affected by developed areas. In addition, I developed a metric called conservation potential to measure the degree of fragmentation of patches caused by development. As an illustration I applied this methodology to Colorado (U.S.A.). Protection levels were determined by examining land ownership, resulting in protected lands (status levels 1 and 2) and unprotected lands (status levels 3 and 4). Areas were considered threatened (at risk) if a land‐cover patch had >20% roaded area, >15% developed area, or was highly fragmented. Although 24 of 43 natural land‐cover types were unprotected (49% of the state), 9 additional types were threatened. Combining conservation‐status protection levels with patterns of threat targets the geographic area where conservation action is needed, provides a way to determine where so‐called protected areas are at risk, and allows conservation strategies to be better refined.

[1]  N. Myers.  The Sinking Ark: A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species , 1979 .

[2]  E. Wilson,et al.  Monitoring Biological Diversity for Setting Priorities in Conservation , 1988 .

[3]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  R. Meaille,et al.  Using geographical information system and satellite imagery within a numerical simulation of regional urban growth , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  T. Spies,et al.  Measuring forest landscape patterns in the cascade range of Oregon, USA , 1991 .

[6]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[7]  Jean E. McKendry,et al.  The role of geography in extending biodiversity gap analaysis , 1993 .

[8]  Bruce A. Pond,et al.  RURAL/URBAN LAND CONVERSION I:ESTIMATING THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS , 1993 .

[9]  William B. Meyer,et al.  Modeling land use and cover as part of global environmental change , 1994 .

[10]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[11]  G. Fischer,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change. Science/research plan , 1995 .

[12]  J. Landis.  IMAGINING LAND USE FUTURES: APPLYING THE CALIFORNIA URBAN FUTURES MODEL , 1995 .

[13]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[14]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Assessments and scientific basis for management options , 1996 .

[15]  David N. Cole,et al.  Threats to Wilderness Ecosystems: Impacts and Research Needs , 1996 .

[16]  Denis White,et al.  Assessing Risks to Biodiversity from Future Landscape Change , 1997 .

[17]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  The Private-Land Problem , 1997 .

[18]  N. Thompson Hobbs,et al.  Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat , 1997 .

[19]  Michael Batty,et al.  Cellular Automata and Urban Form: A Primer , 1997 .

[20]  Adrian G. Davey.  National System Planning for Protected Areas , 1997 .

[21]  Paul M. Randall,et al.  Evaluating the Biotic Integrity of Watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, California , 1998 .

[22]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[24]  R. G. Wright,et al.  Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears Ursus arctos in Idaho , 1999 .

[25]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Terrestrial ecoregions of North America : a conservation assessment , 1999 .

[26]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  The What If? Collaborative Planning Support System , 1999 .

[27]  B. Pijanowski,et al.  Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA , 2000 .

[28]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[29]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions : quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia , 2000 .

[30]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Principles and Guidelines for Managing the Use of Land , 2000 .

[31]  Jill S. Baron,et al.  Management of Land Use Conflicts in the United States Rocky Mountains , 2000 .

[32]  J. Marzluff,et al.  Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World , 2002, Springer US.

[33]  K. Mcallister,et al.  Using current protection status to assess conservation priorities , 2001 .

[34]  D. Fairbanks,et al.  Priority areas for the conservation of South African vegetation: a coarse‐filter approach , 2001 .

[35]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[36]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe* , 2001 .

[37]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss , 2001 .

[38]  Jeremy D. Maestas,et al.  Biodiversity and Land‐Use Change in the American Mountain West , 2001 .

[39]  E. Lambin,et al.  Predicting land-use change , 2001 .

[40]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Land Use Planning Alternatives: Protecting Biodiversity on Private Land , 2002 .

[41]  Andrea Wright Parmenter,et al.  Ecological Causes and Consequences of Demographic Change in the New West , 2002 .

[42]  J. Higgins,et al.  Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice , 2002 .

[43]  David M. Stoms,et al.  GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning , 2004, Landscape Ecology.