A study of the rebound effect on China's current energy conservation and emissions reduction: Measures and policy choices

Energy efficiency improvement leads to a reduction in the real cost of energy services per unit, thus bringing about an increase in the demand for energy services. Therefore, the potential energy savings and emission reduction from efficiency improvements might be offset, which is known as “the rebound effect”. This study disaggregates the effect into the direct and indirect effects based on the Slutsky Equation and finds that the rebound effect of Chinese urban households is approximately 22%. It is found that the indirect effect is stronger than the direct effect. These findings prove that the initial goals of the government on energy conservation and emission reduction could not be achieved by improving energy efficiency alone, but need to be supplemented with relevant energy pricing reforms.

[1]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Defining the rebound effect , 2000 .

[2]  Kenichi Mizobuchi,et al.  An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs , 2008 .

[3]  Horace Herring,et al.  Energy efficiency—a critical view , 2006 .

[4]  M. Binswanger.  Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[5]  Ingeborg Rasmussen,et al.  A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects , 2004 .

[6]  Harry D. Saunders,et al.  A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes , 2000 .

[7]  Kazunori Hokao,et al.  Rebound effect in Chinese household energy efficiency and solution for mitigating it , 2010 .

[8]  N. Lior.  Sustainable energy development (May 2011) with some game-changers , 2012 .

[9]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Increased Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect: Effects on consumption and emissions , 2004 .

[10]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[11]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[12]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: An empirical analysis of China's residents , 2007 .

[13]  H. Saunders,et al.  The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth , 1992 .

[14]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Reform of refined oil product pricing mechanism and energy rebound effect for passenger transportation in China , 2013 .

[15]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  China's energy demand and its characteristics in the industrialization and urbanization process , 2012 .

[16]  H. Saunders.  Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services , 2000 .

[17]  S. Sorrell,et al.  The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions , 2008 .

[18]  Jan Bentzen,et al.  Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption , 2004 .

[19]  M. Einhorn,et al.  Notes - Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances , 1982 .

[20]  Scott Kelly,et al.  Do homes that are more energy efficient consume less energy?: A structural equation model of the English residential sector , 2011 .

[21]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Dilemma between economic development and energy conservation: Energy rebound effect in China☆ , 2012 .

[22]  J. Roy.  The rebound effect : some empirical evidence from India , 2000 .

[23]  Kirit S. Parikh,et al.  Sustainable development and low carbon growth strategy for India , 2012 .

[24]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  An Almost Ideal Demand System , 1980 .

[25]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Comparing climate policies to reduce carbon emissions in China , 2013 .

[26]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  China’s carbon emissions from urban and rural households during 1992–2007 , 2011 .

[27]  J. D. Khazzoom,et al.  Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances , 1980 .

[28]  A. Lovins.  Energy Saving from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances , 1988 .