Performance Assessment of Construction Companies Integrating Key Performance Indicators and Data Envelopment Analysis

The web benchmarking systems broadly used in the construction industry (CI) are designed to provide results based on key performance indicators (KPIs). No insights concerning organization overall performance and improvements targets are available. This research aims to fulfill this gap using data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a method to complement the information provided by a set of KPIs. The methodology proposed is useful to all organizations involved in benchmarking routines. To enable a more realistic assessment of CI companies, two types of DEA models were used, one allows factor weights to vary freely and the other includes weight restrictions. These models assign an efficiency score to each organization, identifying efficient organizations and providing performance improvements targets for the others. To enable suggesting targets for all organizations, expert opinion was used to specify virtual units which were included in the efficiency assessment to define a practical frontier located beyond the productivity levels of the original DEA frontier. Based on a sample of 20 Portuguese leading contractors, the Portuguese web benchmarking system for CI, icBench, was used to demonstrate the advantages of integrating the DEA method with KPIs benchmark scores.

[1]  Richard L. Tucker,et al.  Web-Based Benchmarking System for the Construction Industry , 2005 .

[2]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Performance Assessment of Portuguese Secondary Schools , 2007 .

[3]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[4]  Brenda McCabe,et al.  Introduction Construction , 2022 .

[5]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Benchmarking System for Evaluating Management Practices in the Construction Industry , 2004 .

[6]  C. Caldas,et al.  Benchmarking Initiatives in the Construction Industry: Lessons Learned and Improvement Opportunities , 2006 .

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[8]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Performance Measurement in Construction , 2004 .

[9]  M. Skibniewski,et al.  Supply chain optimization tool for purchasing decisions in B2B construction marketplaces , 2007 .

[10]  R. Edward Minchin,et al.  Firm Performance and Information Technology Utilization in the Construction Industry , 2006 .

[11]  C. Lovell,et al.  Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy , 1995 .

[12]  Maria Henriqueta Nóvoa,et al.  icBench - A benchmarking tool for Portuguese construction industry companies , 2006 .

[13]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[15]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[16]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Establishing the "practical frontier" in data envelopment analysis , 2004 .

[17]  R. Edward Minchin,et al.  Management of Construction Firm Performance Using Benchmarking , 2007 .

[18]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..