Missense mutations in disease genes: a Bayesian approach to evaluate causality.

The problem of interpreting missense mutations of disease-causing genes is an increasingly important one. Because these point mutations result in alteration of only a single amino acid of the protein product, it is often unclear whether this change alone is sufficient to cause disease. We propose a Bayesian approach that utilizes genetic information on affected relatives in families ascertained through known missense-mutation carriers. This method is useful in evaluating known disease genes for common disease phenotypes, such as breast cancer or colorectal cancer. The posterior probability that a missense mutation is disease causing is conditioned on the relationship of the relatives to the proband, the population frequency of the mutation, and the phenocopy rate of the disease. The approach is demonstrated in two cancer data sets: BRCA1 R841W and APC I1307K. In both examples, this method helps establish that these mutations are likely to be disease causing, with Bayes factors in favor of causality of 5.09 and 66.97, respectively, and posterior probabilities of .836 and .985. We also develop a simple approximation for rare alleles and consider the case of unknown penetrance and allele frequency.

[1]  C. Li,et al.  The Derivation of Joint Distribution and Correlation between Relatives by the Use of Stochastic Matrices , 1954 .

[2]  Regina C. Elandt-Johnson,et al.  Probability models and statistical methods in genetics , 1972 .

[3]  B. N. Curnow,et al.  Probability Models and Statistical Methods in Genetics , 1973 .

[4]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  On hierarchical modeling. , 1981 .

[5]  J. Berger,et al.  Testing Precise Hypotheses , 1987 .

[6]  L. Kupper,et al.  Effective testing of gene-disease associations. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  S Greenland,et al.  Methods for epidemiologic analyses of multiple exposures: a review and comparative study of maximum-likelihood, preliminary-testing, and empirical-Bayes regression. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  D. Cooper,et al.  Human Gene Mutation , 1993 .

[9]  D. F. Easton,et al.  The genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  F. Collins,et al.  How is the Human Genome Project doing, and what have we learned so far? , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Pitfalls of genetic testing. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Deloukas,et al.  A Gene Map of the Human Genome , 1996, Science.

[13]  M. Swift,et al.  Molecular genotyping shows that ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes are predisposed to breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[14]  H. Anton-Culver,et al.  BRCA1 R841W: a strong candidate for a common mutation with moderate phenotype. , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[15]  S. Greenland,et al.  Hierarchical modeling of gene-environment interactions: estimating NAT2 genotype-specific dietary effects on adenomatous polyps. , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[16]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  Impact of the Human Genome Project on epidemiologic research. , 1997, Epidemiologic reviews.

[17]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent , 1997 .

[18]  N A Holtzman,et al.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice. , 1997, Science.

[19]  Science, medicine, and the future: Molecular genetic approaches to understanding disease , 1997, BMJ.

[20]  H. Ostrer,et al.  Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[21]  E. Fearon Human cancer syndromes: clues to the origin and nature of cancer. , 1997, Science.

[22]  Molecular genetic approaches to understanding disease , 1997 .

[23]  Impact of the human genome project on the principles for classification and nomenclature of 5-HT receptors. , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  S. Pulst Genetic linkage analysis. , 1999 .