SEED SIZE, NITROGEN SUPPLY, AND GROWTH RATE AFFECT TREE SEEDLING SURVIVAL IN DEEP SHADE

Species differences in seedling survival in deeply shaded understories (i.e., shade tolerance) may depend on both seed size and growth rates, but their relative contributions to survival and how they change with time and with variation in light and belowground resource availability is unknown. With a greenhouse experiment we investigated these relationships by examining responses of growth, growth-related morphology, survival, and their interrelationships to a range of nitrogen (3.4 × 10−9–3.4 × 10−3 mol/L N fertilizer solutions) and low light (0.6–7.3% of open sky) availabilities for young seedlings of 10 North American tree species that vary in observational shade tolerance rankings and seed size (Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera, Betula alleghaniensis, Acer saccharum, Larix laricina, Pinus banksiana, Pinus resinosa, Pinus strobus, Picea mariana, and Abies balsamea). Within all species, relative growth rate (RGR) and survival increased with light. RGR and survival also increased with N supply but only at the two highest light levels, and then only for the shade-intolerant, broad-leaved Populus and Betula spp.. In every species, survival was positively related to RGR. Moreover, each species differed in the relationship of survival to RGR, and these differences were related to seed mass: at any given RGR, large-seeded, shade-tolerant species had higher survival than smaller-seeded, intolerant ones. Across species, in most light and N treatments, seed mass was positively related to young seedling survival, but RGR was not. In very low light the relative benefits of greater seed mass to survival were temporary. As seedlings aged, interspecific mortality rates became more dependent on observational shade tolerance rankings than on seed size, but mortality was still unrelated to RGR. Our results indicate potentially important interactions among light, N, and species that could influence regeneration dynamics. For young seedlings in deeply shaded microsites, N supply does not matter, and only shade-tolerant species survive due, in part, to large seeds and physiological traits other than RGR. In moderate shade, RGR is greater, and survival is high for all species, except that small-seeded, broad-leaved, intolerant species have low survival and RGR at low N supply. This suggests that broad-leaved shade-intolerant species compete more effectively in moderate shade on richer soils than on poorer soils. Although we found that both seed mass and vegetative physiology influenced survival in shade, they did not covary tightly, suggesting that they are under somewhat separate selection pressures.

[1]  P. Reich,et al.  Trade‐offs in low‐light CO2 exchange: a component of variation in shade tolerance among cold temperate tree seedlings , 2000 .

[2]  Mohan K. Wali,et al.  Forest Ecology. Fourth Edition , 1999 .

[3]  P. Reich,et al.  Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: Do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? , 1999 .

[4]  B. Lamont,et al.  Seedling growth response to added nutrients depends on seed size in three woody genera , 1998 .

[5]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light , 1998 .

[6]  D. Burslem,et al.  Mineral nutrient concentrations as a function of seed size within seed crops: implications for competition among seedlings and defence against herbivory , 1998, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[7]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species , 1998 .

[8]  R. Kobe.  Carbohydrate allocation to storage as a basis of interspecific variation in sapling survivorship and growth , 1997 .

[9]  K. Coates,et al.  Models of sapling mortality as a function of growth to characterize interspecific variation in shade tolerance of eight tree species of northwestern British Columbia , 1997 .

[10]  P. Reich,et al.  Growth of Acer saccharum seedlings in deeply shaded understories of northern Wisconsin: effects of nitrogen and water availability , 1997 .

[11]  William G. Lee,et al.  INTERACTION OF IRRADIANCE AND SOIL NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON GROWTH OF SEEDLINGS OF TEN EUROPEAN TALL-SHRUB SPECIES AND FAGUS SYLVATICA , 1996 .

[12]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size , 1996 .

[13]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[14]  S. Ollinger,et al.  Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings , 1996 .

[15]  E. Veenendaal,et al.  Responses of West African Forest Tree Seedlings to Irradiance and Soil Fertility , 1996 .

[16]  Adaptation and inertia in the Australian tropical lowland rain-forest flora: Contradictory trends in intergeneric and intrageneric comparisons of seed size in relation to light demand , 1996 .

[17]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings , 1996 .

[18]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1996 .

[19]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[20]  R. Kobe,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Sapling Mortality and Growth Predicts Geographic Variation in Forest Composition , 1996 .

[21]  K. Kitajima.  Ecophysiology of Tropical Tree Seedlings , 1996 .

[22]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  Seed mass and light requirements for regeneration in Southeast Asian rain forest , 1995 .

[23]  John A. Silander,et al.  Juvenile Tree Survivorship as a Component of Shade Tolerance , 1995 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence , 1994 .

[25]  O. O. Osunkoya,et al.  Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Queensland , 1994 .

[26]  John A. Silander,et al.  Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest , 1994 .

[27]  Peter J. Grubb,et al.  Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals , 1993 .

[28]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Seedlings from Large Seeds Tolerated Defoliation Better: A Test Using Phylogeneticaly Independent Contrasts , 1993 .

[29]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Scale of Nutrient Heterogeneity Around Individual Plants and Its Quantification with Geostatistics , 1993 .

[30]  Gordon A. Fox,et al.  Failure Time Analysis: Emergence, Flowering, Survivorship, and Other Waiting Times , 1993 .

[31]  R. Latham.  Co‐Occurring Tree Species Change Rank in Seedling Performance with Resources Varied Experimentally , 1992 .

[32]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[33]  J. Molofsky,et al.  The Effect of Leaf Litter on Early Seedling Establishment in a Tropical Forest , 1992 .

[34]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf mass per area, nitrogen content and photosynthetic carbon gain in Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting forest light environments , 1992 .

[35]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[36]  T. Spies,et al.  Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests , 1990 .

[37]  R. Peters,et al.  The allometry of seed weight and seedling relative growth rate. , 1990 .

[38]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants , 1990 .

[39]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[40]  Susan A. Foster,et al.  The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants , 1985 .

[41]  C. Augspurger.  Light requirements of neotropical tree seedlings: a comparative study of growth and survival , 1984 .

[42]  P. Grubb,et al.  INTERACTION OF LIGHT AND MINERAL NUTRIENT SUPPLY IN THE GROWTH OF IMPATIENS PARVIFLORA , 1982 .

[43]  Burton Verne Barnes,et al.  Michigan Trees: A Guide to the Trees of Michigan and the Great Lakes Region , 1981 .

[44]  O. Björkman.  Responses to Different Quantum Flux Densities , 1981 .

[45]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[46]  D. A. Marquis.  Seed Storage and Germination Under Northern Hardwood Forests , 1975 .

[47]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[48]  R. Phares.  Growth of Red Oak (Quercus Rubra L.) Seedlings in Relation to Light and Nutrients. , 1971, Ecology.

[49]  K. Loach.  Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. II. Growth analysis of plants raised under artificial shade. , 1970 .

[50]  K. Loach.  SHADE TOLERANCE IN TREE SEEDLINGS , 1967 .

[51]  T. Hutchinson.  COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE ABILITY OF SPECIES TO WITHSTAND PROLONGED PERIODS OF DARKNESS , 1967 .

[52]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Seedling Establishment in Vertical Gradients of Sunlight , 1965 .

[53]  T. A. Bancroft,et al.  ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE FOR INCOMPLETELY SPECIFIED MODELS INVOLVING THE USE OF PRELIMINARY TEST(S) OF SIGNIFICANCE , 1964 .

[54]  E. Salisbury,et al.  The reproductive capacity of plants : studies in quantitative biology , 1942 .

[55]  G. Steinbauer.  GROWTH OF TREE SEEDLINGS IN RELATION TO LIGHT INTENSITY AND CONCENTRATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTION. , 1932, Plant physiology.