Financial economic scenario for the microgeneration of electric energy from swine culture-originated biogas

One of the largest sources of energy available in rural and agro-industrial areas is the biomass, which is found in the form of vegetal and animal residues, such as crop leftovers, animal manure, energetic plantations and agro-industrial effluents. Such residues may be used by rural producers or agro-industries for direct burning, aiming to produce heat or biogas in biodigesters. Swine production generates a large amount of manure that causes environmental issues when not treated properly, due to its high levels of methane. When it is released in the atmosphere, it expressively contributes to the greenhouse effect. The co-generation of electric energy is still one of the ways to utilize biogas generated from food production. Apart from generating energy, it is also possible to sell carbon credits, what provides the producer with higher income. The present work aimed to determine the cost of installation, as well as the feasibility of biogas-based electricity production, by studying the scale economy in several scenarios of swine, biogas and electric energy production, sale or not sale of carbon credits, and investment costs with the estimated amortization period. One can notice that when carbon credits generate profit, production costs decrease and the LPV (Liquid Present Value) increases. Energy production only leads to loss when there is no additional income with carbon credits.

[1]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[2]  Joachim Müller,et al.  Household energy economics in rural Ethiopia: a cost-benefit analysis of biogas energy. , 2012 .

[3]  Abdullah Akbulut,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat generation from farm-scale biogas plant: Çiçekdağı case study , 2012 .

[4]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment , 2011 .

[5]  Christoph Walla,et al.  The optimal size for biogas plants , 2008 .

[6]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[7]  Chih-Sheng Lin,et al.  Ability of a mutant strain of the microalga Chlorella sp. to capture carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading , 2012 .

[8]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. , 2012, Waste management.

[9]  Samuel Nelson Melegari de Souza,et al.  Custo da eletricidade gerada em conjunto motor gerador utilizando biogás da suinocultura - DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v26i2.1510 , 2004 .

[10]  H. Vervaeren,et al.  Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane , 2011 .

[11]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Impact of single versus multiple policy options on the economic feasibility of biogas energy production: Swine and dairy operations in Nova Scotia , 2007 .

[12]  Mirjana Golušin,et al.  Review of the economic viability of investing and exploiting biogas electricity plant – Case study Vizelj, Serbia , 2012 .

[13]  H. Møller,et al.  Process performance of biogas digesters incorporating pre-separated manure , 2007 .

[14]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[15]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production , 2009 .