Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure

Many firms choose to communicate their environmental strategies through voluntary environmental disclosures. This paper examines patterns in the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures made by a sample of around 450 large UK companies drawn from a diverse range of industrial sectors. The analysis distinguishes between five facets of quality, including the disclosure of group-wide environmental policies, environmental impact targets and an environmental audit. We examine how the decisions firms face regarding each facet of quality are determined by firm and industry characteristics, and find the quality of disclosure to be determined by a firm's size and the nature of its business activities. Specifically, we find high quality disclosure to be primarily associated with larger firms and those in sectors most closely related to environmental concerns. In contrast to several recent contributions, we find that the media exposure of companies plays no role in stimulating voluntary disclosures. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  David Campbell,et al.  A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies—a research note , 2004 .

[2]  Bernard Sinclair-Desgagné,et al.  A theory of environmental risk disclosure , 2003 .

[3]  D. Cormier,et al.  Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective , 2003 .

[4]  Dennis M. Patten.  The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note , 2002 .

[5]  Terence Cooke,et al.  Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations , 2002 .

[6]  Dennis M. Patten.  Media Exposure, Public Policy Pressure, and Environmental Disclosure: An Examination of the Impact of Tri Data Availability , 2002 .

[7]  Frances Bowen,et al.  Does Size Matter? , 2002 .

[8]  David Power,et al.  Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension , 2001 .

[9]  Frances Bowen,et al.  Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? , 2000 .

[10]  D. Cormier,et al.  Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits , 1999 .

[11]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[12]  J. Clarke,et al.  The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: a cross sectoral analysis of UK Top 100 Companies , 1999 .

[13]  C. Deegan,et al.  The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory , 1998 .

[14]  S. Sharma,et al.  The biotechnology industry and strategies of biodiversity conservation: The influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity , 1998 .

[15]  Brett Trueman,et al.  Managerial Disclosures and Shareholder Litigation , 1997 .

[16]  Sara A. Morris.  ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF U.S. INDUSTRIAL-GOODS MANUFACTURERS. , 1997 .

[17]  G. Richardson,et al.  Corporate Disclosure of Environmental Liability Information: Theory and Evidence* , 1997 .

[18]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms , 1996 .

[19]  C. Deegan,et al.  A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations , 1996 .

[20]  M. Milne,et al.  Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies , 1996 .

[21]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms , 1995 .

[22]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate social and environmental reporting , 1995 .

[23]  M. Davies,et al.  UK GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom , 1994 .

[24]  Douglas J. Skinner.  WHY FIRMS VOLUNTARILY DISCLOSE BAD-NEWS , 1994 .

[25]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  EFFECTS OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP AND BOARD STRUCTURE ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. , 1993 .

[26]  R. Roberts,et al.  Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory , 1992 .

[27]  Dennis M. Patten.  Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure , 1991 .

[28]  Stephen E. Erfle,et al.  Media, Political Pressure, and the Firm: The Case of Petroleum Pricing in the Late 1970s , 1990 .

[29]  L. Parker,et al.  Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory , 1989 .

[30]  A. Belkaoui,et al.  Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information , 1989 .

[31]  B. Jaggi,et al.  An Analysis of the Association between Pollution Disclosure and Economic Performance , 1988 .

[32]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[33]  Arieh A. Ullmann.  Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[34]  R. Ian Tricker,et al.  Corporate Governance: Practices, Procedures, and Powers in British Companies and Their Boards of Directors , 1984 .

[35]  R. Ingram,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE , 1980 .

[36]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .