Context Affects Scale Selection for Proximity Terms

Abstract Spatial proximity terms, such as near and far, communicate information regarding the distance in which a “located” object can be found with respect to a “reference” object. The present paper investigates whether people take into account the location of an object extraneous to the located object and reference object pair, when setting the scale for proximity language judgements. Across three experiments participants rated the appropriateness of near and far to describe spatial scenes that included a third (distractor) object positioned the same distance as the located object from the reference object, but at varying distances from the located object. The results show that the presence of other spatial relations affects scale setting, resulting in differences in appropriateness ratings for those spatial terms.

[1]  Jodie M Plumert,et al.  What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[2]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgement indicate about spatial representation , 1999 .

[3]  L. Carlson,et al.  The space in spatial language , 2004 .

[4]  T. Regier,et al.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization , 2000, Cognition.

[5]  K. Coventry,et al.  Language within your reach: Near–far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Anchoring on the "here" and "now" in time and distance judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  S. Plous,et al.  Thinking the Unthinkable : The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear Warl , 1989 .

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[9]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  How far is near? Inferring distance from spatial descriptions , 2005 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Unpacking, Repacking, and Anchoring: Advances in Support Theory , 2002 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[12]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  T. McNamara,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry of Human Spatial Memory , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Chez Leggatt-Cook,et al.  ‘Near and Far’ , 2011, Urban studies.

[17]  Dancker D.L. Daamen,et al.  Subliminal anchoring : The effects of subliminally presented numbers on probability estimates , 2006 .

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.

[19]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[20]  Annette Herskovits Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English , 2009 .

[21]  D. Kemmerer “Near” and “far” in language and perception , 1999, Cognition.

[22]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  M. Mascolo,et al.  Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Thomas Tinkham,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Clustering on the Learning of Second Language Vocabulary. , 1993 .

[26]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Reference points in spatial cognition. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[27]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[29]  John D. Kelleher,et al.  Spatial Prepositions in Context: The Semantics of near in the Presence of Distractor Objects , 2006, ACL 2006.

[30]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Interpreting spatial terms involves simulating interactions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[32]  M. Jarymowicz,et al.  Asymmetry in the estimation of interpersonal distance and identity affirmation , 1989 .

[33]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  The Perception and Cognition of Environmental Distance: Direct Sources of Information , 1997, COSIT.