Neural Aspects of Sentence Comprehension: Syntactic Complexity, Reversibility, and Reanalysis

Broca's area is preferentially activated by reversible sentences with complex syntax, but various linguistic factors may be responsible for this finding, including syntactic movement, working-memory demands, and post hoc reanalysis. To distinguish between these, we tested the interaction of syntactic complexity and semantic reversibility in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of sentence–picture matching. During auditory comprehension, semantic reversibility induced selective activation throughout the left perisylvian language network. In contrast, syntactic complexity (object-embedded vs. subject-embedded relative clauses) within reversible sentences engaged only the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and left precentral gyrus. Within irreversible sentences, only the LIFG was sensitive to syntactic complexity, confirming a unique role for this region in syntactic processing. Nonetheless, larger effects of reversibility itself occurred in the same regions, suggesting that full syntactic parsing may be a nonautomatic process applied as needed. Complex reversible sentences also induced enhanced signals in LIFG and left precentral regions on subsequent picture selection, but with additional recruitment of the right hemisphere homolog area (right inferior frontal gyrus) as well, suggesting that post hoc reanalysis of sentence structure, compared with initial comprehension, engages an overlapping but larger network of brain regions. These dissociable effects may offer a basis for studying the reorganization of receptive language function after brain damage.

[1]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[3]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Working memory and syntax interact in Broca's area , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[6]  G. Waters,et al.  Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Michael Cannizzaro,et al.  Sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia: History and variability to clinical implications , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[8]  D. Swinney,et al.  How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[9]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Yoshihiro Muragaki,et al.  Agrammatic Comprehension Caused by a Glioma in the Left Frontal Cortex , 2022 .

[11]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[12]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study , 1982, Cognition.

[13]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[14]  David Caplan,et al.  Aphasic Deficits in Syntactic Processing , 2006, Cortex.

[15]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Speech and language functions that require a functioning Broca’s area , 2008, Brain and Language.

[17]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  David Caplan,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Constraint Effects on Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal Correlates of Comprehension of Relative Clauses , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Anatomical Correlates of Sentence Comprehension and Verbal Working Memory in Neurodegenerative Disease , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Just,et al.  Language comprehension: sentence and discourse processing. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  D. Swinney,et al.  A Functional Neuroimaging Investigation of the Roles of Structural Complexity and Task-Demand During Auditory Sentence Processing , 2006, Cortex.

[22]  David Caplan,et al.  Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing , 2008, Cortex.

[23]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Is Broca's area involved in the processing of passive sentences? An event-related fMRI study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Neuronal Activation for Semantically Reversible Sentences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Carolyn Harford,et al.  Recruiting Comparative Crosslinguistic Evidence to Address Competing Accounts of Agrammatic Aphasia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[28]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[29]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Knowing where but not what: Impaired thematic roles and spatial language , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[31]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration , 2004, MICCAI.

[32]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[34]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia , 2006, Brain and Language.

[35]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  F. Cuetos,et al.  The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive , 2001, Brain and Language.

[37]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI II. Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia II: Neurological aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[40]  C. Luzzatti,et al.  Syntactic comprehension deficits in agrammatism. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[41]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[42]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Linguistic prominence and Broca's area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle , 2006, NeuroImage.

[43]  F. Dick,et al.  Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. , 2001, Psychological review.

[44]  Rita Sloan Berndt,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis , 1996, Cognition.

[45]  C. Price,et al.  Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Ryuta Kinno,et al.  Neural correlates of noncanonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture‐sentence matching task , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  David Caplan,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Syntactic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: A Critical Selective Review , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[49]  G. Raboyeau,et al.  Right hemisphere activation in recovery from aphasia , 2008, Neurology.

[50]  Y. Grodzinsky A Restrictive Theory of Agrammatic Comprehension , 1995, Brain and Language.

[51]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Level Set Methods in an EM Framework for Shape Classification and Estimation , 2004, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[52]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in the processing of unmarked transitivity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[54]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[55]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[56]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[57]  M. Just,et al.  Aphasic Sentence Comprehension as a Resource Deficit: A Computational Approach , 1997, Brain and Language.

[58]  M. Piñango,et al.  The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity , 2003, Brain and Language.

[59]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration. , 2001 .

[60]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.