Determining appropriate first contact distance : trade-offs in human-robot interaction experiment design

Robots are increasingly working in close proximity to and in collaboration with people. Yet much is still unknown about the best behaviors for robots to use in interactions with humans. For example, in approaching someone for help, is there an optimal distance from a candidate person at which the robot should attempt to initiate contact? What distance is neither so far away as to risk not getting the person’s attention nor so close that the person has already committed to passing the robot? Experiments that attempt to answer such questions must balance tensions. In this paper, we argue for relatively lowcost, rapid turnaround experiments achieved by carrying out experiments “in the wild” in partially controlled ways using Wizard of Oz robot control with on-board sensing. We present the trade-offs of such experiments and illustrate the approach with a set of experiments we are carrying out to determine an appropriate distance for initial contact.

[1]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Designing social greetings in human robot interaction , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[2]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How to approach humans?-strategies for social robots to initiate interaction , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A long-term Human-Robot Proxemic study , 2011, 2011 RO-MAN.

[4]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  The First Challenge on Generating Instructions in Virtual Environments , 2010, Empirical Methods in Natural Language Generation.

[5]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[6]  M. Tscheligi,et al.  Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots , 2010, HRI 2010.

[7]  L. van Haaren,et al.  Evaluating Quality of Spoken Dialogue Systems: Comparing a Technology-focused and a User-focused Approach , 1998 .

[8]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics , 2014, ISER.

[9]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Socially Distributed Perception: GRACE plays social tag at AAAI 2005 , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[10]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[11]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  A larger audience, please! — Encouraging people to listen to a guide robot , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[14]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Designing robots in the wild , 2014, HRI 2014.

[15]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Navigation in the presence of humans , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[16]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..