Acceptability and complications of prostate biopsy in population-based PSA screening versus routine clinical practice: a prospective, controlled study.

[1]  T. Tammela,et al.  The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). , 2010, British journal of urology.

[2]  A. Zisman,et al.  The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of voiding impairment. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[3]  A. Zlotta,et al.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[4]  A. Zisman,et al.  The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[5]  M. Toublanc,et al.  Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Cooke,et al.  Patients’ tolerance of transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases , 1999, BJU international.

[7]  T. Tammela,et al.  European randomized study of prostate cancer screening: first-year results of the Finnish trial , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  F. Labrie,et al.  Screening decreases prostate cancer death: First analysis of the 1988 Quebec Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial , 1999, The Prostate.

[9]  M. Terris,et al.  Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  L. Denis,et al.  The European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer , 1997, Cancer.

[11]  F. Schröder,et al.  Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-based screening program. , 1997, Urology.

[12]  H. Nijs,et al.  Randomised Trial of Prostate Cancer Screening in the Netherlands: Assessment of Acceptance and Motives for Attendance , 1997, Journal of medical screening.

[13]  B. Doré,et al.  Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[14]  P. Prorok,et al.  Prospective Evaluation Plan for Randomised Trials of Prostate Cancer Screening , 1996, Journal of medical screening.

[15]  I. Thompson,et al.  Morbidity with contemporary prostate biopsy. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. , 1993, British journal of urology.

[17]  G N Collins,et al.  Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies--true morbidity and patient acceptance. , 1993, British journal of urology.

[18]  R. Clements,et al.  Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. , 1993, Clinical radiology.

[19]  C. Naughton,et al.  Impact of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy on quality of life: a prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 cores. , 2001, The Journal of urology.