The Mid‐Domain Effect: There’s a Baby in the Bathwater

In a recent article (Colwell et al. 2004; hereafter CRG), we reviewed all studies of the mid-domain effect (MDE) published up to that time and responded to earlier critiques of MDE by (among others) Hawkins and Diniz-Filho (2002) and Zapata et al. (2003). The discussion continues here with comments on our article by Hawkins, DinizFilho, and Weiss (2005; hereafter HDW) and by Zapata, Gaston, and Chown (2005; hereafter ZGC). In this article, we respond to HDW and ZGC. Null models and null hypotheses. ZGC defend their view of MDE models as null hypotheses subject to falsification. In contrast, proponents of MDE theory have always held that richness patterns have multiple causes. For example, referring to the effect of geometric (boundary) constraints on geographic patterns of species richness, Colwell and Lees (2000, p. 79) stated that “the question is not whether geometry affects such patterns, but by how much.” We view any assessment of the role of geometric constraints as a problem of estimating the magnitude of the contribution (if any) of MDE to richness patterns (“how much”). Just as with other candidate causes of richness patterns (e.g., climatic, topographic, or historical drivers), the appropriate null hypothesis (if any) is that MDE makes no contribution to richness patterns, not that MDE uniquely and fully accounts for richness patterns. It is for this reason that we distinguish between MDE as a model and the hypotheses that can be framed regarding its predictions.

[1]  R. Chazdon,et al.  A bounded null model explains juvenile tree community structure along light availability gradients in a temperate rain forest , 2006 .

[2]  J. E. Watkins,et al.  Vascular epiphyte distribution patterns: explaining the mid‐elevation richness peak , 2006 .

[3]  K. Gaston,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect Revisited , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Diversity Gradients: Is There Anything to Learn? , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[5]  S. Raghu,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Evidence: Statistical, Philosophical and Empirical Considerations , 2005 .

[6]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Neutral community dynamics, the mid‐domain effect and spatial patterns in species richness , 2005 .

[7]  D. R. Robertson,et al.  CAUSES OF LATITUDINAL GRADIENTS IN SPECIES RICHNESS: A TEST WITH FISHES OF THE TROPICAL EASTERN PACIFIC , 2005 .

[8]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Phylogeny can make the mid-domain effect an inappropriate null model , 2005, Biology Letters.

[9]  N. Rozbaczylo,et al.  Biogeographical patterns and Rapoport's rule in southeastern Pacific benthic polychaetes of the Chilean coast , 2005 .

[10]  Sean R Connolly,et al.  Process‐Based Models of Species Distributions and the Mid‐Domain Effect , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[11]  S. Herzog,et al.  The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: a foothill peak and a high‐elevation plateau , 2005 .

[12]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  An evolutionary tolerance model explaining spatial patterns in species richness under environmental gradients and geometric constraints , 2005 .

[13]  H. T. Arita.  Range size in mid-domain models of species diversity. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF BAND SUM AREA, DOMAIN EXTENT, AND RANGE SIZES ON THE LATITUDINAL MID-DOMAIN EFFECT , 2005 .

[15]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism , 2004 .

[16]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[18]  P. Rodríguez,et al.  Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation , 2004 .

[19]  N. Brummitt,et al.  Elevational gradients, area and tropical island diversity: an example from the palms of New Guinea , 2004 .

[20]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Bayesian inference in ecology , 2004 .

[21]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Species Richness Patterns:What Have We Learned So Far? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[22]  P. Sale.  Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition , 1974, Oecologia.

[23]  János Podani,et al.  RANDOMIZATION OF PRESENCE–ABSENCE MATRICES: COMMENTS AND NEW ALGORITHMS , 2004 .

[24]  D. Inouye,et al.  A phenological mid-domain effect in flowering diversity , 2004, Oecologia.

[25]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[26]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness , 2003 .

[27]  D. Bellwood,et al.  INDO‐PACIFIC BIODIVERSITY OF CORAL REEFS: DEVIATIONS FROM A MID‐DOMAIN MODEL , 2003 .

[28]  K. Gaston,et al.  Mid-domain models of species richness gradients: assumptions, methods and evidence. , 2003, The Journal of animal ecology.

[29]  J. Silander,et al.  Geometric constraints and spatial pattern of species richness: critique of range‐based null models , 2002 .

[30]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  The mid-domain effect cannot explain the diversity gradient of Nearctic birds , 2002 .

[31]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geographic Range Size and Determinants of Avian Species Richness , 2002, Science.

[32]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Null models and spatial patterns of species richness in South American birds of prey , 2002 .

[33]  K. Gaston,et al.  Latitudinal gradients in diversity: real patterns and random models , 2001 .

[34]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in African birds , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[36]  Colwell,et al.  The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[38]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evolution of a Species' Range , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[39]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[40]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Eocene continental climates and latitudinal temperature gradients , 1995 .

[41]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Nonbiological Gradients in Species Richness and a Spurious Rapoport Effect , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[42]  E. Pianka,et al.  Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .

[43]  W. Armbruster.  REPRODUCTIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SYMPATRIC DALECHAMPIA SPECIES: ARE NATURAL ASSEMBLAGES "RANDOM" OR ORGANIZED? , 1986 .

[44]  R. Poole,et al.  Regularity, randomness, and aggregation in flowering phenologies. , 1979, Science.