Introductory Overview of the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network: Examining the Impact of US Health Policies and Practices to Prevent Diabetes and Its Complications

Purpose of ReviewDiabetes incidence is rising among vulnerable population subgroups including minorities and individuals with limited education. Many diabetes-related programs and public policies are unevaluated while others are analyzed with research designs highly susceptible to bias which can result in flawed conclusions. The Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network includes eight research centers and three funding agencies using rigorous methods to evaluate natural experiments in health policy and program delivery.Recent FindingsNEXT-D2 research studies use quasi-experimental methods to assess three major areas as they relate to diabetes: health insurance expansion; healthcare financing and payment models; and innovations in care coordination. The studies will report on preventive processes, achievement of diabetes care goals, and incidence of complications. Some studies assess healthcare utilization while others focus on patient-reported outcomes.SummaryNEXT-D2 examines the effect of public and private policies on diabetes care and prevention at a critical time, given ongoing and rapid shifts in the US health policy landscape.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[2]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[3]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[4]  S. Majumdar,et al.  The unhealthy state of health policy research. , 2009, Health affairs.

[5]  L. Green,et al.  Diffusion Theory and Knowledge Dissemination, Utilization, and Integration in Public Health , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[6]  M. Gold.  Pathways to the use of health services research in policy. , 2009, Health services research.

[7]  D. Lavallee,et al.  PHP5 Innovative Methods for Stakeholder Engagement: An Environmental Scan , 2012 .

[8]  A. Ferrara,et al.  Patient Satisfaction and Perceived Success with a Telephonic Health Coaching Program: The Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study, Northern California, 2011 , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[9]  D. Ross-Degnan,et al.  Impact of Emerging Health Insurance Arrangements on Diabetes Outcomes and Disparities: Rationale and Study Design , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[10]  S. Goodman,et al.  Causal inference in public health. , 2013, Annual review of public health.

[11]  P. Hogan,et al.  Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U , 2013 .

[12]  Evaluation of the Diabetes Health Plan to Improve Diabetes Care and Prevention , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[13]  A. Ferrara,et al.  Health-Plan and Employer-Based Wellness Programs to Reduce Diabetes Risk: The Kaiser Permanente Northern California NEXT-D Study , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[14]  S. Hill,et al.  Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group: leading the field on health communication evidence , 2013, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[15]  R. Ackermann,et al.  Designing a Natural Experiment to Evaluate a National Health Care–Community Partnership to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[16]  J. Albu,et al.  Expansion of Electronic Health Record-Based Screening, Prevention, and Management of Diabetes in New York City , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[17]  C. Hunter,et al.  News from the NIH: research to evaluate “natural experiments” related to obesity and diabetes , 2014, Translational behavioral medicine.

[18]  L. Geiss,et al.  Prevalence and incidence trends for diagnosed diabetes among adults aged 20 to 79 years, United States, 1980-2012. , 2014, JAMA.

[19]  J. Sloan,et al.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  C. Mangione,et al.  Optimizing enrollment in employer health programs: a comparison of enrollment strategies in the Diabetes Health Plan. , 2014, The American journal of managed care.

[21]  L. Bero,et al.  Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  Thomas D. Cook,et al.  Examining the Internal Validity and Statistical Precision of the Comparative Interrupted Time Series Design by Comparison With a Randomized Experiment , 2014 .

[23]  Megan J. Hoopes,et al.  Community Health Center Use After Oregon’s Randomized Medicaid Experiment , 2015, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[24]  M. Hernán.  A good deal of humility: Cochran on observational studies. , 2015, Observational studies.

[25]  R. Brownson,et al.  State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy. , 2015, Health education research.

[26]  S. Downer,et al.  Beating Type 2 Diabetes: Recommendations for Federal Policy Reform , 2015 .

[27]  C. Mangione,et al.  Adherence to Metformin, Statins, and ACE/ARBs Within the Diabetes Health Plan (DHP) , 2015, Journal of general internal medicine.

[28]  Lauren S. Hughes,et al.  State innovation model initiative: a state-led approach to accelerating health care system transformation. , 2015, JAMA.

[29]  J. DeVoe,et al.  Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report , 2015, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[30]  J. Schmittdiel,et al.  Employer-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[31]  Rui Li,et al.  The State of Evaluation Research on Food Policies to Reduce Obesity and Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 2000–2011 , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.

[32]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research. , 2015, Health policy.

[33]  C. Mangione,et al.  Evaluating diabetes health policies using natural experiments: the natural experiments for translation in diabetes study. , 2015, American journal of preventive medicine.

[34]  S. Majumdar,et al.  How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.

[35]  Mohammed K. Ali,et al.  OPPORTUNISTIC SCREENING FOR DIABETES AND PREDIABETES USING HEMOGLOBIN A1C IN AN URBAN PRIMARY CARE SETTING. , 2015, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[36]  Michael A. Rodríguez,et al.  Community Health Centers Play a Critical Role in Caring for the Remaining Uninsured in the Affordable Care Act Era. , 2016, Policy brief.

[37]  Heather Angier,et al.  Using the electronic health record for assessment of health insurance in community health centers , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[38]  Christine Y. Lu,et al.  Diabetes Outpatient Care and Acute Complications Before and After High-Deductible Insurance Enrollment: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[39]  G. Wilensky.  The Future of the ACA and Health Care Policy in the United States. , 2017, JAMA.

[40]  Megan J. Hoopes,et al.  Protocol for the analysis of a natural experiment on the impact of the Affordable Care Act on diabetes care in community health centers , 2017, Implementation Science.

[41]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research , 2017, Annual review of public health.

[42]  Zachary F. Meisel,et al.  Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future , 2017, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[43]  E. Gregg,et al.  An Interrupted Time Series Analysis to Determine the Effect of an Electronic Health Record–Based Intervention on Appropriate Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Urban Primary Care Clinics in New York City , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[44]  A. Ferrara,et al.  The Impact of Telephonic Wellness Coaching on Weight Loss: A “Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D)” Study , 2016, Obesity.