Relationship between reconstruction quality and scan type for compressive sensing based on cone beam CT reconstruction

There is a direct evidence that the radiation doses associated with CT scans are associated with an increase in cancer risk. To reduce the radiation dose and simultaneously maintain the CT reconstruction quality, numerous algorithms have been proposed such as compressive sensing (CS) technique. CS theory asserts that one can recover certain signals and images from far fewer samples or measurements than traditional methods use. In this study, we mainly consider the relationship between the CT reconstruction quality and two undersampled scan types of CS technique, i.e., the sparse-view scan and limited-view scan. The results demonstrate that an appropriate selection of scan type of CS technique can effectively control the radiation dose.

[1]  Gengsheng Lawrence Zeng,et al.  Medical Image Reconstruction: A Conceptual Tutorial , 2010 .

[2]  G. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  E. Sidky,et al.  Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT , 2009, 0904.4495.

[4]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  I. Kawrakow Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. , 2000, Medical physics.

[6]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  P. Lions,et al.  Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems , 1997 .

[8]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[9]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[11]  P. Gilbert Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  G T Herman,et al.  Image reconstruction from a small number of projections , 2008, Inverse problems.

[13]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[14]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.