The use of pressure change on standing as a surrogate measure of the stiffness of a compression bandage.

OBJECTIVES To measure interface pressure and stiffness of short-stretch and long-stretch bandages applied with variable strength. These parameters have a deciding influence on the efficacy of compression therapy in chronic venous disease. DESIGN Prospective experimental study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Compression bandages constructed of different materials were applied with light, moderate and high pressure. Interface pressure was measured over the medial aspect of leg in 12 healthy individuals. Long-stretch bandages were compared to short-stretch bandages. The difference between standing and supine pressure was used to characterise stiffness. RESULTS In the low pressure range the median pressure of the final bandage in the supine position was between 18 and 30 mmHg for the long-stretch and 25-33.5 mmHg for the short-stretch bandages (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). The median differences between standing and supine pressure were between 2.0 and 8.5 for the long-stretch and 6.0-10.5 mmHg for the short-stretch material. In the group of moderate pressure the median values in the supine position were in a range 33.0-58.0 mmHg, for long-stretch and 39.0-49.5 mmHg for short-stretch bandages, with an increase after standing of 6.0-7.0 mmHg with long-stretch, and 14.0-21.0 mmHg with short-stretch bandages (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). The median supine pressure values in the high pressure group were between 52.0 and 67.0 mmHg for long-stretch and 59.5-67.0 mmHg for short-stretch material. The median increase during standing ranged between 8.5 and 14.5 mmHg in the elastic group and 23.0-33.0 in the inelastic group (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). CONCLUSION A bandage applied with light pressure corresponds to the moderate pressure category of stockings. The difference between the sub-bandage pressure from supine to standing can be used to characterise the stiffness of a bandage.

[1]  J C Barbenel,et al.  Device for measuring soft tissue interface pressures. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[2]  R. Prescott,et al.  Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  R. STOLK,et al.  A Method for Measuring the Dynamic Behavior of Medical Compression Hosiery during Walking , 2004, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[4]  E. A. Nelson,et al.  Compression for venous leg ulcers. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  E. A. Nelson,et al.  Compression bandages and stockings for venous leg ulcers. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  M. Jünger,et al.  The ratio of working pressure to resting pressure under compression stockings: Its significance for the improvement of venous perfusion in the legs , 2001, Phlebologie.

[7]  E. A. Nelson,et al.  Compression for venous leg ulcers. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  H. Partsch,et al.  [Indications-related use of stockings--measuring venous pump function]. , 1989, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[9]  J. Bergan,et al.  Compression Therapy of the Extremities , 2001 .

[10]  H. Partsch [Improving the venous pumping function in chronic venous insufficiency by compression as dependent on pressure and material]. , 1984, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[11]  Hugo Partsch,et al.  The Static Stiffness Index: A Simple Method to Assess the Elastic Property of Compression Material In Vivo , 2005, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[12]  A. Mostbeck,et al.  Inelastic leg compression is more effective to reduce deep venous refluxes than elastic bandages. , 1999, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[13]  H. Partsch,et al.  Compression and walking versus bed rest in the treatment of proximal deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  R. Williams,et al.  Movement-related variation in forces under compression stockings. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  M W Ferguson-Pell,et al.  Design Criteria for the Measurement of Pressure at Body/Support Interfaces: , 1980 .

[16]  G. Burg,et al.  A comparison of multilayer bandage systems during rest, exercise, and over 2 days of wear time. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.

[17]  R. Prescott,et al.  Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg , 2003 .

[18]  Holger Hänssle,et al.  Instruction of Compression Therapy by Means of Interface Pressure Measurement , 2000, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].