On Flipping a Large Signal Processing Class

Modern academy traces its roots back to the medieval universities established between the 12th and the 14th centuries [1]. Much has changed in the world of academia during the millennium that separates a modern university from a medieval one. Among these changes, there are two that arguably stand out the most. First, university education is no longer considered the exclusive purview of a select few; rather, it has become a basic human right for all. Second, technology has become an integral component of university education, be it the delivery of information through multimedia presentations, the use of email for student–teacher interactions, the reliance on course management systems for submission and grading of assignments, or the adoption of e-books as class texts. But there is one thing in academia that has remained largely unchanged since the advent of medieval university, namely, the mode of instruction. Lecturing—in which an instructor imparts knowledge to its audience by standing in front of them and reciting relevant information that is recorded by the attendees—was the only mode of instruction in medieval universities [1]. And lecturing remains the dominant mode of instruction in modern academy. This is despite the fact that research on learning indicates lecturing is not the most effective means of helping students master the course material [2]–[5]. The reason for the survival of lectures in modern academy is simple: among all the modes of instruction available to today’s instructors, lecturing remains the quickest and cheapest means of educating large numbers of students. The purpose of this article is to argue, however, that a carefully “flipped” classroom can be used to replace a traditional lecture-based classroom with minimal time, cost, and infrastructure overhead, even for large classes with 100’s of students. The findings reported in this article are mostly based on the author’s seminal 15-week flipped offering of a junior-level signal processing class with final enrollment of 133 students in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in Spring 2016 Semester.

[1]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  MOOC Adventures in Signal Processing: Bringing DSP to the era of massive open online courses , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  John C. Scott The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations , 2006 .

[3]  Kristen M. Burson,et al.  Starting the Conversation: An Exploratory Study of Factors That Influence Student Office Hour Use , 2014 .

[4]  Moti Frank,et al.  Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course , 2003 .

[5]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems , 2007 .

[6]  Kendall Powell,et al.  Science education: Spare me the lecture , 2003, Nature.

[7]  Embry-Riddle Aeronautical,et al.  The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research , 2013 .

[8]  John R. Bourne,et al.  ONLINE ENGINEERING EDUCATION: LEARNING ANYWHERE, ANYTIME , 2019 .

[9]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Flipping Core Courses in the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: Heat Transfer. , 2016 .

[10]  John R. Buck Designing Active Learning Environments , 2016 .

[11]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Project-based learning. , 1998, NT learning curve.

[12]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  Student–Faculty Interaction in Research Universities: Differences by Student Gender, Race, Social Class, and First-Generation Status , 2009 .

[13]  Jamie L. Jensen,et al.  Improvements from a Flipped Classroom May Simply Be the Fruits of Active Learning , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[14]  Barry D. Van Veen Flipping Signal-Processing Instruction [SP Education] , 2013, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[15]  John G. Harris,et al.  Lessons Learned from Two Years of Flipping Circuits I , 2015 .

[16]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Dropout rates of massive open online courses : behavioural patterns , 2014 .

[17]  Mark L. Fowler Flipping signals and systems — Course structure & results , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  Kathleen E. Cook,et al.  Inverting (Flipping) Classrooms - Advantages and Challenges , 2013 .

[19]  Paul Ginns,et al.  Anonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems , 2006 .

[20]  C. Phillips,et al.  The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  J. Stowell,et al.  Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion , 2007 .

[22]  John D. Carpinelli,et al.  Learning outside the classroom - Flipping an Undergraduate Circuits Analy- sis Course , 2013 .

[23]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria , 2010 .

[24]  Karin Sonnleitner,et al.  From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side , 2016 .

[25]  Hamid Hadim,et al.  Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[26]  Barbara Limbach,et al.  Questioning the Lecture Format. , 2005 .

[27]  Edward F. Gehringer Resources for "Flipping" Classes , 2015 .

[28]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  On the Use and Misuse of Lectures in Higher Education , 2015 .

[29]  S. DiCarlo,et al.  Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution? , 2006, Advances in physiology education.

[30]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .