Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity?

Recent calls for reform, such as Vision and Change: A Call to Action, have described a vision to transform undergraduate biology education and have noted the need for faculty to promote this change toward a more iterative and evidence-based approach to teaching (American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 2011). A key challenge is convincing many faculty—not just a handful of faculty scattered across the country but the majority of life sciences faculty in every institution—to change the way they teach. Few would disagree that this is an ambitious goal. Change is difficult in any setting, but changing academic teaching appears to be especially tricky. Calls for change imply that the pedagogical approaches our own professors and mentors modeled and taught us might not be the best way to engage large numbers of diverse populations of undergraduates in our discipline. This effort potentially also involves telling faculty that what they have been doing for the past 5, 10, or even 30 yr may not the most effective approach, especially for today’s students. Widespread change in undergraduate biology teaching—or in any of the sciences for that matter—has been documented to be difficult (Hender-

[1]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[2]  I. Fras.  Identity: Youth and Crisis , 1968 .

[3]  C. Hansel.  Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[4]  D. Lortie.  Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[5]  A Department-Based Approach to Developing Teaching Portfolios: Perspectives for Faculty and Department Chairs. , 1995 .

[6]  Nira Hativa.  The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: A qualitative evaluation , 1995 .

[7]  D. Kember,et al.  Action Research into the Quality of Student Learning: A Paradigm for Faculty Development. , 1996 .

[8]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Teachers' craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education , 1997 .

[9]  John W. Rushin,et al.  Graduate Teaching Assistant Training: A Basis for Improvement of College Biology Teaching & Faculty Development? , 1997 .

[10]  Causes.  Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists , 1998 .

[11]  Robert C. Clark,et al.  Technology Infusion and Higher Education: Changing Teaching and Learning , 1999 .

[12]  Dorothy A. Frayer,et al.  Creating a Campus Culture To Support a Teaching and Learning Revolution. , 1999 .

[13]  J. Gee.  Identity as an analytic lens for research in education , 2000 .

[14]  Kathleen M. Quinlan,et al.  Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context , 2000 .

[15]  Milton Glaser,et al.  Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three Years After the Boyer Report. , 2001 .

[16]  Ann E. Austin.  Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career , 2002 .

[17]  Gerald H. Krockover,et al.  Reforming and Assessing Undergraduate Science Instruction Using Collaborative Action-Based Research Teams. , 2002 .

[18]  Ronald D. Anderson.  Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry , 2002 .

[19]  S. Moser,et al.  Reflections on a Discipline-wide Project: Developing active learning modules on the human dimensions of global change , 2003 .

[20]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  Use of learner-centered instruction in college science and mathematics classrooms , 2003 .

[21]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  The Implications of Culture and Identity: A Professor's Engagement with a Reform Collaborative , 2003 .

[22]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Paths to the Professoriate: Strategies for Enriching the Preparation of Future Faculty , 2004 .

[23]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University , 2004 .

[24]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[25]  Michaela Borg.  The apprenticeship of observation , 2004 .

[26]  John L. Romano,et al.  Faculty at Mid-Career: A Program to Enhance Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[27]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[28]  Judy M. Wedman,et al.  A Process Model for Faculty Development: Individualizing Technology Learning , 2004 .

[29]  Guy C. Colarulli,et al.  Fostering Faculty Collaboration in Learning Communities: A Developmental Approach , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew Hannan,et al.  Innovating in higher education: contexts for change in learning technology , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[32]  Mark Pickett,et al.  Bridging Engineering and Science Teaching: A Collaborative Effort to Design Instruction for College Students , 2006 .

[33]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A Systems Model of Innovation Processes in University STEM Education , 2006 .

[34]  Jeffrey W. Bloom,et al.  Unintended Consequences: How Science Professors Discourage Women of Color , 2007 .

[35]  Angela C. Johnson,et al.  Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color , 2007 .

[36]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. , 2007 .

[37]  Katerina V. Thompson,et al.  A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiology. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[38]  Louise Yarnall,et al.  Adapting Scenario-based Curriculum Materials to Community College Technical Courses , 2007 .

[39]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Strategies for Preparing Integrated Faculty: The Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning. , 2008 .

[40]  David Pundak,et al.  Empowering Engineering College Staff to Adopt Active Learning Methods , 2008 .

[41]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Farewell, Lecture? , 2009, Science.

[42]  C. Henderson,et al.  Beyond Dissemination in College Science Teaching: An Introduction to Four Core Change Strategies , 2010 .

[43]  M. J. Rae,et al.  On the Mind , 1855, Journal of psychological medicine and mental pathology.

[44]  Supporting Online Material for Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities , 2011 .

[45]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Integrating Teaching and Research in Undergraduate Biology Laboratory Education , 2011, PLoS biology.

[46]  R. Losick,et al.  Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities , 2011, Science.

[47]  D. G. Halme,et al.  Improving Graduate Education to Support a Branching Career Pipeline: Recommendations Based on a Survey of Doctoral Students in the Basic Biomedical Sciences , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[48]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills , 2011, Science.

[49]  C. Henderson,et al.  Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .

[50]  Jennifer L. Momsen,et al.  What We Say is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs , 2011 .

[51]  Dale Winter,et al.  Novice Instructors and Student-Centered Instruction: Identifying and Addressing Obstacles to Learning in the College Science , 2012 .

[52]  University Funding Systems: Impact on Research and Teaching , 2012 .

[53]  John Tagg,et al.  Why Does the Faculty Resist Change? , 2012 .

[54]  Michael Roach,et al.  Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement , 2012, PloS one.

[55]  Ronald D. Anderson.  Inquiry as an Organizing Theme for Science Curricula , 2013 .