Reflectance anisotropy for measuring soil surface roughness of multiple soil types

Abstract Information on soil surface roughness at the centimetre scale is needed for inclusion in a range of physical and functional algorithms including heat budgets, runoff and sediment transfer models, and can also be used to understand soil degradation processes. Previous work has shown that such information can be obtained from multiple view angle measurements of hyperspectral Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factors (HCRFs), but the issue of whether this technique works on soils of different biochemical composition has not yet been demonstrated. The objective of this work was therefore to determine the capability of these approaches for discriminating soil surface roughness conditions when different soil types are considered. Five soil types with varying biochemical properties were subjected to artificial rainfall, producing a sequence of soil states of progressively declining soil surface roughness. Point laser data (2 mm sample spacing) were geostatistically analysed to give a spatially-distributed measure of surface roughness. HCRFs from the soil states were measured using a ground-based hyperspectral spectroradiometer for a range of viewing zenith angles in the solar principal plane from the extreme forwardscatter (− 60°) to the extreme backscatter (+ 60°) at 10° sampling resolution in the solar principal plane. A directional index (Anisotropy Measure; AM) was determined, using a ratio between extreme forward-scattered and backscattered HCRFs. Regression analysis of AM against a geostatistically-derived value of soil surface roughness (sill variance) was used to test the ability of the AM for description of surface roughness for all soil types. The results show that use of a directional AM index dramatically improved the relationship with sill variance compared to the use of a single viewing angle (R2 = 0.68 at θr = 40°; R2 = 0.88 (AM)), demonstrating the great potential of this approach for compensating for spectral differences between different soil types. The results provide an empirical and theoretical basis for the future retrieval of spatially-distributed assessments of soil surface structure across larger spatial extents.

[1]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Review Article Principles of field spectroscopy , 1987 .

[2]  Y. Bissonnais,et al.  Laboratory experimental study of soil crusting: Relation between aggregate breakdown mechanisms and crust stucture , 1989 .

[3]  Jerzy Cierniewski,et al.  Influence of soil surface roughness on soil bidirectional reflectance , 1997 .

[4]  E. Ben-Dor.  The reflectance spectra of organic matter in the visible near-infrared and short wave infrared region (400-2500 nm) during a controlled decomposition process , 1997 .

[5]  J. Tisdall,et al.  Organic matter and water‐stable aggregates in soils , 1982 .

[6]  K. Kriebel,et al.  On the limited validity of reciprocity in measured BRDFs , 1996 .

[7]  David Favis-Mortlock,et al.  Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion models , 1999 .

[8]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Plant Litter and Soil Reflectance , 2000 .

[9]  P. Hallett,et al.  Root‐ and microbial‐derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport , 2000 .

[10]  A. Mosier,et al.  Soil processes and global change , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[11]  D. Kimes.  Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. , 1983, Applied optics.

[12]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil degradation by erosion , 2001 .

[13]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[14]  Nikolaus J. Kuhn,et al.  Variations in soil structure and reflectance during a controlled crusting experiment , 2008 .

[15]  Roselyne Lacaze,et al.  Retrieval of vegetation clumping index using hot spot signatures measured by POLDER instrument , 2002 .

[16]  J. Chen,et al.  A hotspot function in a simple bidirectional reflectance model for satellite applications , 1997 .

[17]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Field Experiment for Measurement of the Radiative Characteristics of a Hazy Atmosphere , 1986 .

[18]  Mehrez Zribi,et al.  Operational performance of current synthetic aperture radar sensors in mapping soil surface characteristics in agricultural environments: application to hydrological and erosion modelling , 2008 .

[19]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Variability of soil surface characteristics influencing runoff and interrill erosion , 2005 .

[20]  P. Naden,et al.  Long term variation in water colour from Yorkshire catchments. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  J. Muller,et al.  The value of multiangle measurements for retrieving structurally and radiatively consistent properties of clouds, aerosols, and surfaces , 2005 .

[22]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  From Field‐ to Landscape‐Scale Vadose Zone Processes: Scale Issues, Modeling, and Monitoring , 2006 .

[23]  Dominique Arrouays,et al.  Organic Matter Influence on Clay Wettability and Soil Aggregate Stability , 2000 .

[24]  Nicolas Baghdadi,et al.  Remote-sensing data as an alternative input for the ‘STREAM’ runoff model , 2005 .

[25]  M. Cutler,et al.  Hyperspectral indices for characterizing upland peat composition , 2004 .

[26]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  The potential of hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance distribution function data for grass canopy characterization , 1999 .

[27]  R. S. Swift,et al.  The influence of organic matter on aggregate stability in some British soils , 1984 .

[28]  G. Hunt.  SPECTRAL SIGNATURES OF PARTICULATE MINERALS IN THE VISIBLE AND NEAR INFRARED , 1977 .

[29]  Ian C. Lau,et al.  Practical applications of hyperspectral remote sensing in regolith research , 2003 .

[30]  Nikolaus J. Kuhn,et al.  Characterizing soil surface roughness using a combined structural and spectral approach , 2009 .

[31]  Holly Croft,et al.  Remote sensing of soil surface properties , 2009 .

[32]  G. Levy,et al.  Prewetting rate and aging effects on seal formation and interrill soil erosion , 1997 .

[33]  A. Holtslag,et al.  A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation , 1998 .

[34]  M J Duggin,et al.  Field measurement of reflectance: some major considerations. , 1982, Applied optics.

[35]  Nils-Axel Mörner,et al.  Carbon degassing from the lithosphere , 2002 .

[36]  R. Lacaze,et al.  Multi-angular optical remote sensing for assessing vegetation structure and carbon absorption , 2003 .

[37]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Physical Mechanisms in Hyperspectral BRDF Data of Grass and Watercress , 1998 .

[38]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial Scale Problems and Geostatistical Solutions: A Review , 2000 .

[39]  E. Ben-Dor,et al.  The Spectral Reflectance Properties of Soil Structural Crusts in the 1.2‐ to 2.5‐μm Spectral Region , 2003 .

[40]  T. Zobeck,et al.  Using bi-directional soil spectral reflectance to model soil surface changes induced by rainfall and wind-tunnel abrasion , 2006 .