Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential

The population of older adults in America is expected to reach an unprecedented level in the near future. Some of them have difficulties with performing daily tasks and caregivers may not be able to match pace with the increasing need for assistance. Robots, especially mobile manipulators, have the potential for assisting older adults with daily tasks enabling them to live independently in their homes. However, little is known about their views of robot assistance in the home. Twenty-one independently living older Americans (65–93 years old) were asked about their preferences for and attitudes toward robot assistance via a structured group interview and questionnaires. In the group interview, they generated a diverse set of 121 tasks they would want a robot to assist them with in their homes. These data, along with their questionnaire responses, suggest that the older adults were generally open to robot assistance but were discriminating in their acceptance of assistance for different tasks. They preferred robot assistance over human assistance for tasks related to chores, manipulating objects, and information management. In contrast, they preferred human assistance to robot assistance for tasks related to personal care and leisure activities. Our study provides insights into older adults’ attitudes and preferences for robot assistance with everyday living tasks in the home which may inform the design of robots that will be more likely accepted by older adults.

[1]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[2]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Patterns of Functional Loss Among Older People: A Prospective Analysis , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Lars Oestreicher,et al.  User Expectations on Human-Robot Co-operation , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults , 2009, HCI.

[7]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Sketching the future: Assessing user needs for domestic robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[8]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Domestic applications for social robots: an online survey on the influence of appearance and capabilities , 2008 .

[9]  B. MacDonald,et al.  Attitudes towards health‐care robots in a retirement village , 2012, Australasian journal on ageing.

[10]  Geraldine Boyle,et al.  The role of autonomy in explaining mental ill-health and depression among older people in long-term care settings , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[11]  Jason M. Fields,et al.  America's Families and Living Arrangements: 2003. Population Characteristics. Current Population Reports. P20-553. , 2004 .

[12]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Older Adults’ Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for Everyday Living Tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[14]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  M. Baltes,et al.  Everyday functioning and successful aging: the impact of resources. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[16]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Functional Limitations to Daily Living Tasks in the Aged: A Focus Group Analysis , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Sven Wachsmuth,et al.  Classes of Applications for Social Robots: A User Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Mark H. Lee,et al.  Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly , 2006, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[19]  P. Baltes,et al.  Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. , 1990 .

[20]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[21]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  An Initial Framework to Unpack Long-Term Acceptance of Robots at Home , 2010 .

[22]  Lawton Mp Aging and performance of home tasks. , 1990 .

[23]  M. Lawton Aging and Performance of Home Tasks , 1990, Human factors.

[24]  Renxi Qiu,et al.  User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home , 2012, HRI 2012.

[25]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Challenges to Aging in Place: Understanding Home Maintenance Difficulties , 2011, Journal of housing for the elderly.

[26]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Older Adults’ Needs for Assistance as a Function of Living Environment , 2011, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[27]  Maya Cakmak,et al.  Towards a comprehensive chore list for domestic robots , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  More than a Servant: Self-Reported Willingness of Younger and Older Adults to having a Robot perform Interactive and Critical Tasks in the Home , 2009, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[29]  U. Flick An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[30]  Cara Bailey Fausset,et al.  Responding to Home Maintenance Challenge Scenarios , 2014, Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society.

[31]  Paul B. Baltes,et al.  Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences , 1990 .

[32]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[33]  Kerstin Eder,et al.  Symmetry Reduction Enables Model Checking of More Complex Emergent Behaviours of Swarm Navigation Algorithms , 2015, TAROS.

[34]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  U. Flick An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed. , 2009 .

[36]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[37]  R. Klein,et al.  Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[38]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[39]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  What Can a Personal Robot Do for You? , 2011, TAROS.